2017
DOI: 10.1137/16m1097626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guaranteed, Locally Space-Time Efficient, and Polynomial-Degree Robust a Posteriori Error Estimates for High-Order Discretizations of Parabolic Problems

Abstract: We consider the a posteriori error analysis of approximations of parabolic problems based on arbitrarily high-order conforming Galerkin spatial discretizations and arbitrarily highorder discontinuous Galerkin temporal discretizations. Using equilibrated flux reconstructions, we present a posteriori error estimates for a norm composed of the L 2 (H 1 )∩H 1 (H −1 )-norm of the error and the temporal jumps of the numerical solution. The estimators provide guaranteed upper bounds for this norm, without unknown con… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The continuous Petrov-Galerkin method in time with linear trial and constant test functions (denoted cGP (1)) is equivalent to the Crank-Nicholson method. Recently, higher order dG(k)-and cGP(k)-methods have been developed and analyzed for parabolic and hyperbolic problems [25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continuous Petrov-Galerkin method in time with linear trial and constant test functions (denoted cGP (1)) is equivalent to the Crank-Nicholson method. Recently, higher order dG(k)-and cGP(k)-methods have been developed and analyzed for parabolic and hyperbolic problems [25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 2.4 (Heat equation). Sharp estimates of the inf-sup constant β for the heat equation (with µ(t) ≡ 1 on I so that α = M = 1 and κ = 0) can be found in [36,10] using the above norms.…”
Section: Moreover Using Again the Coercivity Of A(t) And The Boundedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A := T 0 ∇v 2 Ω dt, with · Ω denoting the L 2 -norm over Ω (for proof, see for instance [9]). For each trial function u ∈ S, there is an optimal choice of test function v ∈ L 2 (0, T ; H 1 0 (Ω)) that achieves the supremum in (1.1); in the discrete setting, this mapping between trial and optimal test functions leads to a left-preconditioner that symmetrizes the system in a stable way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the inf-sup theory for parabolic problems has previously found application in other contexts, such as a priori error analysis [35], a posteriori analysis [9], and reduced-basis methods [36]. We also refer the reader to the textbooks [8,33] for an introduction to the inf-sup theorem for general linear equations in Banach spaces, and its application to parabolic problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%