2012
DOI: 10.1002/sat.1005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GSSTP: a signalling transport protocol for DVB‐S2 GSE‐only transmission systems

Abstract: SUMMARYThe current signalling framework for Digital Video Broadcasting systems is based on MPEG-2 encoded Program Specific Information and System Information tables that rely on the transport stream. It is expected that in the near future, this architecture will be replaced by one based on the Generic Stream Encapsulation protocol, paving the way for the convergence of DVB-S2 broadcast transmission networks and IP infrastructure. This paper presents a new lightweight Generic Stream Signalling Transport Protoco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, security at the base-band frame layer has the advantage of low bandwidth costs and of being transparent to the link-layer protocol format. When DVB-SI and DVB-RCS Forward Link Signaling (FLS) control information is encapsulated into ULE/GSE packets [17], or when a newer signaling mechanism is adopted [22], base-band frame layer security can be simulated at the link layer by using the packet length confidentiality service and enlarging the outer packet size to that of the base-band frame, which allows to retain compatibility as well as the link-layer security solution's high flexibility and functionality at little bandwidth overhead. This scheme can now be trivially turned into a base-band frame layer security solution by omitting the static protocol base header of the outer encapsulation packet (e.g., as per signaling via the base-band frame header's SYNC byte), reducing bandwidth overhead to a minimum while permitting all security functionality to be efficiently shared between both layers.…”
Section: Traffic Flow Confidentialitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, security at the base-band frame layer has the advantage of low bandwidth costs and of being transparent to the link-layer protocol format. When DVB-SI and DVB-RCS Forward Link Signaling (FLS) control information is encapsulated into ULE/GSE packets [17], or when a newer signaling mechanism is adopted [22], base-band frame layer security can be simulated at the link layer by using the packet length confidentiality service and enlarging the outer packet size to that of the base-band frame, which allows to retain compatibility as well as the link-layer security solution's high flexibility and functionality at little bandwidth overhead. This scheme can now be trivially turned into a base-band frame layer security solution by omitting the static protocol base header of the outer encapsulation packet (e.g., as per signaling via the base-band frame header's SYNC byte), reducing bandwidth overhead to a minimum while permitting all security functionality to be efficiently shared between both layers.…”
Section: Traffic Flow Confidentialitymentioning
confidence: 99%