2014
DOI: 10.4204/eptcs.154.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GSOS for non-deterministic processes with quantitative aspects

Abstract: Recently, some general frameworks have been proposed as unifying theories for processes combining non-determinism with quantitative aspects (such as probabilistic or stochastically timed executions), aiming to provide general results and tools. This paper provides two contributions in this respect. First, we present a general GSOS specification format (and a corresponding notion of bisimulation) for non-deterministic processes with quantitative aspects. These specifications define labelled transition systems a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stochastic GSOS (SGSOS) and Weighted GSOS appear to be a special case of Miculan and Peressotti's weight function GSOS. In [35,41] a treatment is given for PEPA, in line with Section 5 of the present paper. The formats mentioned above arise from the abstract theory of SOS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stochastic GSOS (SGSOS) and Weighted GSOS appear to be a special case of Miculan and Peressotti's weight function GSOS. In [35,41] a treatment is given for PEPA, in line with Section 5 of the present paper. The formats mentioned above arise from the abstract theory of SOS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the treatment below the bi-algebraic perspective of SOS and bisimulation [55] is left implicit. In [41] an approach similar to ours has been applied to the ULTraS model, a model which shares some features with simple FuTS. In ULTraS posets are used instead of semirings, although a monoidal structure is then implicitly assumed when process equivalences are taken into consideration [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We stress the fact that behavioural functors are "syntax agnostic": they define the semantic behaviours, abstracting from any specific concrete representation of systems. In the wake of these important results, many functors have been defined for modelling a wide range of behaviours: deterministic and nondeterministic systems [30]; systems with I/O, with names, with resources [12,13]; systems with quantitative aspects such as probabilities [10,22,27,28,37]; systems with continuous states [3], etc. Despite these results, a general coalgebraic treatment of higher-order systems is still missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The format ntyft/ntyxt is translated to the probabilistic setting in [11], while generation of axiomatizations [1,4] for probabilistic GSOS is reported in [10]. In [26] socalled weight-function SOS is proposed for ULTraS, a generalization of probabilistic transition systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%