Grundriss der Volkskunde: Einfuhrung in die Forschungsfelder der Europaischen Ethnologie

Bendix, Regina; Brednich, Rolf Wilhelm

doi:10.2307/541522

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…empirischen Subjektivierungsforschung (vgl. Lehmann 1983, Brednich 2007. Ethnografie bedeutet für mich, soziale und kulturelle Phänomene über akteursspezifische Erfahrungsdimensionen in den Blick zu nehmen und diese mit einem verstehenden Zugang zu erschließen (vgl.…”

Section: Rache Ethnografieren: Das Forschungsdesignunclassified

Wissenskrisen - Krisenwissen

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bielefeld zur Geschichte der Tropikalität in der US-amerikanischen Medizin und Public Health im frühen 20. Jahrhundert. Ihre Forschungsschwerpunkte sind Medizin-und Umweltgeschichte, Imperial-und Globalgeschichte und die Geschichte des Rassismus. Jason Lemberg arbeitet als wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Lehrstuhl zur Erforschung der Geschichte und Wirkung des Holocaust an der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main. Er forscht zur Universitäts-und Wissenschaftsgeschichte des Nationalsozialismus. Arne Maibaum promoviert an der TU Berlin zur Robotik als Wissenschaft und Robotik-Wettkämpfen. Seine Forschungsschwerpunkte sind die Techniksoziologie, Science and Technology Studies und das Feld der robotischen Pflege. Andie Rothenhäusler ist Doktorand am Institut für Technikzukünfte des Karlsruher Instituts für Technologie. In seiner Dissertation beschäftigt er sich mit Konflikten um neue Technologien. Darüber hinaus ist er in der Wissenschaftskommunikation tätig, unter anderem beim ZDF-Format »Terra X Geschichteder Podcast«. Meike Wiegand ist wissenschaftliche Hilfskraft am Panel on Planetary Thinking der Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen. Sie forscht zur Wissenschaftsphilosophie der (Molekular-)Biologie.

show abstract

Section: Rache Ethnografieren: Das Forschungsdesignunclassified

Wissenskrisen - Krisenwissen

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Hans Naumann's <em>gesunkenes Kulturgut</em> and <em>primitive Gemeinschaftskultur</em>

Dow¹

2014

Journal of Folklore Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hans Naumann is known primarily for the term gesunkenes Kulturgut, to such a degree that he is inseparable from the term. It is rarely translated but just left in the German original. It was, however, his conception of primitive communal culture that caused the harshest reaction to his work, evoked negative criticism during Nazism, and was condemned to the end of the twentieth century. Hans Naumann assumed a theoretical stance in the 1920s that thrust him into a maelstrom of controversy he could not possibly have anticipated, the final results of which affected his reputation and cost him his academic position and nearly his life. This paper will survey much of that scholarship for the Englishspeaking world; it will probe the contents of the two works in which his primary concepts are presented; there will be detail on Naumann's excursions into Nazism-based to some degree on information found in a 2001 "biographical novel" by his son Andreas Naumann, which has not yet been assessed by Naumann scholars. Hans Naumann's work will be treated by shifting our gaze away from "sunken goods" and toward "primitive communal culture," suggesting why such a reassessment is important today. Finally, in order to contribute to our understanding of the role Hans Naumann has played in folklore, translations into English of the two works where his concepts appear will be presented.Meinem Kollegen Wolfgang Jacobeit gewidmet.

show abstract

Switzerland and the UNESCO Convention on Intangible Cultural Heritage

Leimgruber¹

2010

Journal of Folklore Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 2008, Switzerland ratified both the Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expression and the Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage. In a direct democracy these decisions closely involve multiple stakeholders. In this article, organizations and associations involved in the ratification process will be introduced and discussed against the background of the history of the intangible heritage convention. Next, I will address questions about particular understandings of culture and cultural concepts held by these different organizations, as well as the cultural and sociopolitical objectives or agendas they pursue through the implementation of the Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage. The term Volkskultur plays a particularly important role in this context since it is often directly equated with intangible culture; thus, the article discusses the implications of this equation, including the cultural and political approaches that stem from it. On March 20, 2008, the Swiss Parliament approved-by a wide majority-two international treaties: one, the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions; the other, the UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage. The decision was subject to an optional referendum; that is, if 50,000 citizens had so requested, the ratification would have been submitted to the Swiss electorate for approval. However, since no political group adopted the referendum, the Swiss Federal Council deposited the ratification instruments at the headquarters of UNESCO in Paris after the July 10, 2008,

show abstract

Grundriss der Volkskunde: Einfuhrung in die Forschungsfelder der Europaischen Ethnologie

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Wissenskrisen - Krisenwissen

Wissenskrisen - Krisenwissen

Hans Naumann's <em>gesunkenes Kulturgut</em> and <em>primitive Gemeinschaftskultur</em>

Switzerland and the UNESCO Convention on Intangible Cultural Heritage

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About