2001
DOI: 10.1007/bf02652739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grundlagen der Ergänzung des internationalen PISA-Mathematik-Tests in der deutschen Zusatzerhebung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The guideline for the development of the national mathematics tests was the systematic consideration of the four content domains: arithmetic, algebra, geometry and stochastic, as well as three types of mathematical tasks: technical skills, calculative modelling, and conceptual modelling (Klieme et al, 2001;Neubrand et al, 2001;Neubrand et al, 2002). The additional German mathematics test in PISA 2000 consisted of 117 items.…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The guideline for the development of the national mathematics tests was the systematic consideration of the four content domains: arithmetic, algebra, geometry and stochastic, as well as three types of mathematical tasks: technical skills, calculative modelling, and conceptual modelling (Klieme et al, 2001;Neubrand et al, 2001;Neubrand et al, 2002). The additional German mathematics test in PISA 2000 consisted of 117 items.…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BM). Dazu kam die Klasse der technischen Aufgaben (TA), die nur den Abruf von Fertigkeiten oder Faktenwissen erfordern (Neubrand 2003;Neubrand et al 2001). Für unsere Analysen wurden die erzielten Punkte bei diesen (bei der Zuordnung disjunkten und exhaustiven) Aufgabenklassen zu insgesamt drei Skalenscores für TF, RM und BM (s. Abb.…”
Section: Untersuchungsmethodeunclassified
“…At that time, Werner and his colleagues on the German PISA Consortium provided a number of significant resources to assist the MEG in its work and to add to that work the benefits of the work taking place around that time in Germany. Schupp (1988), Blum (1996), and the German PISA Framework extension (Neubrand et al, 2001) all came to the MEG from Werner. Werner's contribution to the deep consideration of weighty matters that have been on the MEG agenda since 2000 has been consistent and very highly valued.…”
Section: Early Days: From 2000mentioning
confidence: 99%