2017
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-2248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth Tracking in Severely Obese or Underweight Children

Abstract: The modified CDC score chart is suitable for growth tracking of children with normal and extreme growth patterns; the measures correlate well with the %BMI and the chart can be incorporated easily into existing electronic health record systems for clinical use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, methods other than the ICC could be used to evaluate tracking, such as examining the ability of a high BMI to predict a high BMI in later life. It should also be noted that though we did not assess the other alternative BMI metrics that have been proposed, that is, modified z score (18,19) and %BMIp95 (10,14,17,46) , these two metrics were highly correlated (r > 0•95) with adjusted % distance from the median. However, values of % distance from the median are more closely tied to the CDC growth charts and may be more interpretable than modified BMIz or %BMIp95.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, methods other than the ICC could be used to evaluate tracking, such as examining the ability of a high BMI to predict a high BMI in later life. It should also be noted that though we did not assess the other alternative BMI metrics that have been proposed, that is, modified z score (18,19) and %BMIp95 (10,14,17,46) , these two metrics were highly correlated (r > 0•95) with adjusted % distance from the median. However, values of % distance from the median are more closely tied to the CDC growth charts and may be more interpretable than modified BMIz or %BMIp95.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These limitations have resulted in various alternatives being proposed for analyses with BMI as a continuous variable. They include focusing on changes in BMI rather than in BMIz in longitudinal analyses (15,16) , expressing a child's BMI as a percentage of the 95th percentile (%BMIp95) (9,10,14,17) and using a modified z score that extrapolates a fixed SD outwards (18) . Although these metrics avoid the compression of very high BMIs into a narrow range of z scores, it is unclear whether they are useful for lower BMIs and whether they convey similar information across ages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, the findings observed here may not generalize to other Hispanic subgroups or to adolescents of a different race/ethnicity. Fifth, in this study we used the modified BMI z-score developed by the CDC to overcome recognized limitations of BMIz that hinder valid correlations with adiposity in severely obese children [49, 98]. However, the most appropriate measure for tracking BMI over time remains unclear and may depend on the population studied and degree of obesity [99].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, BMIaz does not have an upper limit, and the values are not compressed into a fixed range. The modified z-scores correlate more strongly with measures of adiposity in obese and severely obese children and have been recommended for use with these populations in place of BMIz [55, 56]. Demographic (i.e., parents’ education and marital status) and measured height and weight data from the parent enrolled in the MACS were obtained from the MACS database.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the effect of the intervention on adiposity in the child and adult we conducted a quasi-experimental, one group evaluation to measures changes in BMI from baseline to week 6 (final week of education phase). The primary outcome was the modified CDC Z-score for a child’s BMI [ 26 ]. Since 2017, the CDC has provided a modified Z-score for children that helps tracking of children in the extremes of the BMI distribution [ 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%