1988
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0248(88)90560-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth temperature dependent atomic arrangements and their role on band-gap of InGaAlP alloys grown by MOCVD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3(a) and (b). These structures are the same as those proposed for the long-range-ordered structures by Nozaki, Ohba, Sugawara, Yasuami & Nakanisi (1988) and Suzuki, Gomyo & Iijima (1988).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…3(a) and (b). These structures are the same as those proposed for the long-range-ordered structures by Nozaki, Ohba, Sugawara, Yasuami & Nakanisi (1988) and Suzuki, Gomyo & Iijima (1988).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…From the STM images here, the InGaP layer does not display obvious ordering. Previous studies reveal that the 4K PL emission will change from 1.98 eV to 1.91 eV when InGaP layer goes from fully disordered to partially ordered [12]. PL spectra from an InGaP sample with identical growth condition to the sample used here shows a peak energy of 1.97 eV [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Ordering of the alloy is an important phenomenon for InGaP. It has been found that, under certain growth conditions, the cations (Ga and In) are ordered on ( 1 11) or (1 1 1) planes [8,12]. From the STM images here, the InGaP layer does not display obvious ordering.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…7 Depending on growth conditions, InGaP can exist either an ordered arrangement of cations or a disordered one, with band gaps of these forms differing by about 0.05 eV. 8 The InGaP studied in the present work is of the disordered variety, 9 with room-temperature band gap of about 1.90 eV. 10 The CB offset between InGaP and GaAs is known to be relatively small, [i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%