2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth, ruminal and metabolic parameters and feeding behavior of Nellore cattle with different residual feed intake phenotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence of this, a positive effect on feed efficiency was observed. Contrary to Trevizan and coworkers [ 29 ], our results showed that low RFI animals spent less time at the feed bunk when compared to animals with medium and high RFI for a similar amount of feed consumed per visit. In previous mentioned study, the stocking density (5.9 animals/feeder) was much higher in our study suggesting that feeding time may be affected by group size as well.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a consequence of this, a positive effect on feed efficiency was observed. Contrary to Trevizan and coworkers [ 29 ], our results showed that low RFI animals spent less time at the feed bunk when compared to animals with medium and high RFI for a similar amount of feed consumed per visit. In previous mentioned study, the stocking density (5.9 animals/feeder) was much higher in our study suggesting that feeding time may be affected by group size as well.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it can be considered that low RFI animals are more efficient as their performance is the same, but less feed resource was needed to capture that performance. Animals with low RFI are efficient in feed utilization, as demonstrated by their good production potential despite lower feed intake, without losses in growth or ruminal and metabolic parameters investigated by Trevizan and coworkers [ 29 ]. Our results are in agreement with previously reported literature data [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, expanding herd size and land use to meet projected food demands is undesirable due to the environmental impacts associated with livestock production [3]. In this context, there is an increasing interest in the use of feed efficiency (FE) indexes/markers in animal breeding programs to select for animals that produce more meat or milk while consuming less feed [4]. In beef cattle, residual feed intake (RFI), which is the difference between observed dry matter intake (DMI) and expected DMI based on animal development metrics [5], has been widely used to calculate the FE of growing cattle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as in the present study, no variation in the ruminal fermentation profile was found by other authors . Nevertheless, according to Trevizan et al [2], other factors may have greater relevance to the efficiency of these animals than the ruminal fermentation profile. In this sense, Elolimy et al [5] found different profiles of microorganisms and different metabolic potentials associated with metabolites of energetic pathways between low and high-efficiency Holstein heifers at birth and during preweaning.…”
Section: Ruminal Fermentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the search for sustainability, animals that are more efficient at converting food into product are of unquestionable relevance [1,2]. The evaluation of feed efficiency can be obtained from measuring indexes such as feed conversion, average daily weight gain (ADG), residual body weight gain, residual feed intake (RFI), residual intake and body weight gain, or a combination of some of these indexes [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%