2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.11.047
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth responses of narrow or broad site adapted tree species to a range of resource availability treatments after a full harvest rotation

Abstract: Understanding the processes driving forest productivity is a critical element in our efforts to maximize production of biomass and wood products and more efficiently utilize resources required for plant growth. We examined above and belowground growth and productivity of four tree specieseastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides), American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda)receiving irrigation and fertilization in the Upper Coastal Plain ecoregion … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(102 reference statements)
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent with those of previous studies, which investigated the effects of fertilization on the biomass allocation of hardwood species [77][78][79]. Albaugh et al [79] used data from nine sites in which nutrient and water optimization studies were carried out with a 2 × 2 factorial design to determine maximum biomass production in response to a simple set of treatments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our findings are consistent with those of previous studies, which investigated the effects of fertilization on the biomass allocation of hardwood species [77][78][79]. Albaugh et al [79] used data from nine sites in which nutrient and water optimization studies were carried out with a 2 × 2 factorial design to determine maximum biomass production in response to a simple set of treatments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Trees received irrigation (0.5 cm day −1 , for a total of 3.0 cm week −1 ), fertilization (120 kg N ha −1 year −1 ), and irrigation + fertilization or were untreated (control). Loblolly pine did not respond to irrigation during early [31] or late [30] development, indicating that fertilization was the primary limiting factor of tree productivity. Maximum aboveground woody production of loblolly pine exceeded 19.0 dry Mg ha −1 year −1 , and annual stem productivity was nearly 10.0 dry Mg ha −1 year −1 .…”
Section: Loblolly Pinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the growth of both clones was significantly improved by increasing resource availability throughout the harvest rotation [29,30]. After nine growing seasons, aboveground woody production was 7.2 and 6.4 dry Mg ha −1 year −1 in 'ST66' and 'S7C15', respectively [30]. Irrigation and fertilization resulted in aboveground productivity increases of >177 %.…”
Section: Cottonwoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the growth rate of these species is not excessively compromised when no liming and fertilization are applied, particularly in the first rotations (Reissmann and Wisniewski, 2000). However, positive responses to fertilization were observed under different managements and in different environments (Muniz et al, 1975;Reissmann and Wisniewski, 2000;Ferreira et al, 2001;Moro et al, 2014;Coyle et al, 2016). Moreover, the nutrients exported by the crops must be replenished (Viera et al, 2011), which is a fundamental practice to reduce the environmental impact of any agricultural or forestry crop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%