1985
DOI: 10.1080/0028825x.1985.10425309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth, reproduction, and production biology of mouse-ear and king devil hawkweed in eastern South Island, New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
1
4

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
23
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…King devil responded better to alsike clover because of its normally taller, erect habit and greater leaf extension when shaded (Makepeace 1980). However, white clover was more restricted in height by its stoloniferous habit and grew around, but did not overgrow, plants of mouse-ear which performed well.…”
Section: Alsikementioning
confidence: 95%
“…King devil responded better to alsike clover because of its normally taller, erect habit and greater leaf extension when shaded (Makepeace 1980). However, white clover was more restricted in height by its stoloniferous habit and grew around, but did not overgrow, plants of mouse-ear which performed well.…”
Section: Alsikementioning
confidence: 95%
“…My field experience is that the pattern of//, pilosella incidence within and between blocks is only weakly related to any patterns of past or present fertiliser use, apart from their general reduction from clover competition with fertiliser. Although Makepeace's (1985) growth rate measurements indicate that H. pilosella may ultimately reach its maximum occurrence in the mid-rainfall zone (c. 800 mm), these may be more interpretable in terms of the high top-soil P status of soils in that zone from loess input than from any applied fertiliser. Adams (1987) made a particular study of Hieracium pilosella in the present PxS trial in its 5th year.…”
Section: Hieraciummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment with the lowest yield was the king devil monoculture at 0 fertility level-5x cutting (55 kg DM/ha). The low yields at the 0 fertility level fell within the range of values between 10 and 1350 kg DM/ha that Makepeace (1985a) estimated for mouse ear and king devil in Mackenzie Basin tussock grasslands. Consequently the interference responses observed at this low fertility level are most relevant to unfertilised field situations where Makepeace made his observations.…”
Section: Environmental Perspectivementioning
confidence: 89%
“…Mouse ear grows better than king devil on dry sites (Makepeace 1985a). Consequently, irrigation to avoid water deficit would have favoured interference from king devil over mouse ear.…”
Section: Environmental Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%