1997
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth rate-optimised tRNA abundance and codon usage 1 1Edited by J. H. Miller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
75
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On one hand, enhancing the accuracy of translation provides economy of energy consumption, which may increase the cell growth rate and, in turn, fitness (Bulmer 1991). On the other hand, enhancing the speed of translation could maintain the pool of free ribosomes and thus optimize the growth rate (Kurland et al 1996) and, finally, fitness (Bulmer 1991;Berg and Kurland 1997). Hence, selection for speed and accuracy of protein synthesis explains how codon usage may act on the growth rate and then on fitness in many species including C. elegans.…”
Section: Does Codon Usage Improve the Accuracy The Speed Of Translatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, enhancing the accuracy of translation provides economy of energy consumption, which may increase the cell growth rate and, in turn, fitness (Bulmer 1991). On the other hand, enhancing the speed of translation could maintain the pool of free ribosomes and thus optimize the growth rate (Kurland et al 1996) and, finally, fitness (Bulmer 1991;Berg and Kurland 1997). Hence, selection for speed and accuracy of protein synthesis explains how codon usage may act on the growth rate and then on fitness in many species including C. elegans.…”
Section: Does Codon Usage Improve the Accuracy The Speed Of Translatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tRNA gene copy number correlates generally well with codon use in some species (Dong et al 1996;Berg and Kurland 1997;Percudani et al 1997;Duret 2000;see Plotkin and Kudla 2011). Although codon bias may reflect differently in different species, that which is most clearly supported is correlation with translation efficiency of mRNAs (Sharp et al 1986;Sorensen et al 1989;Plotkin and Kudla 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite many proposals, no single satisfactory explanation of skews and their diversity exists (7). Bacterial codon usage also seems complicated and multifactorial; there is evidence for translational selection resulting from uneven expression of the tRNAs (8,9), optimization of tRNA pools to the existing codon usage (10,11), and evidence for the primary role of neutral mutational pressure rather than selection (12,13). Importantly, these mechanisms by themselves do not explain diversity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During synthesis, a polymerase (DNA or RNA polymerase, ribosome) moves along a template and translates it to a product sequence by discriminating between competing adaptors (tRNAs for translation, dNTPs for replication, NTPs for transcription). The optimal allocation of different adaptors depends on template letter usage, as suggested for translation (10,11,15,16), whereas selection and mutation pressure on letter usage depend on resource allocation (8,9,16). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%