2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12155-021-10304-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth, Proximate Composition, and Photosynthesis of Chlorella vulgaris Cultures Between a Photobioreactor Based in a Compound Parabolic Concentrator and a Plain Tubular System for a Biorefinery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system with a concentrator improved the irradiance level of the culture by 351% and the average light intensity of the cells by 462%. During the exponential phase, C. vulgaris grew more quickly in the tube system (1.14 div/day) than in the concentrator system (0.98 div/day); however, its cells were larger in the concentrator system (11.23 m) than in the tube system (6.28 m), and between days 2 to 4 of the cultivation, the CPC system produced more biomass than the tube system did in terms of organic dry weight and proteins, lipids, and carbs [105].…”
Section: Techno-economic Barriersmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The system with a concentrator improved the irradiance level of the culture by 351% and the average light intensity of the cells by 462%. During the exponential phase, C. vulgaris grew more quickly in the tube system (1.14 div/day) than in the concentrator system (0.98 div/day); however, its cells were larger in the concentrator system (11.23 m) than in the tube system (6.28 m), and between days 2 to 4 of the cultivation, the CPC system produced more biomass than the tube system did in terms of organic dry weight and proteins, lipids, and carbs [105].…”
Section: Techno-economic Barriersmentioning
confidence: 87%