2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth problems of stellar black holes in early galaxies

Abstract: The nature of the seeds of the observed high-z super-massive black holes (SMBH) is unknown. Although different options have been proposed, involving e.g. intermediate mass direct collapse black holes, BH remnants of massive stars remain the most natural explanation. To identify the most favorable conditions (if any) for their rapid growth, we study the accretion rate of a M • = 100M BH formed in a typical z = 10 galaxy under different conditions (e.g. galaxy structure, BH initial position and velocity). We mod… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They can grow SMBHs in the available time if either with continuous accretion at the Eddington limit or with short episode of super-Eddington growth. In reality, E-mail: r.matsukoba@astr.tohoku.ac.jp however, the BH's growth can easily be hindered by its own radiative feedback (Milosavljević et al 2009;Park & Ricotti 2011;Sugimura et al 2018;Orofino et al 2018). An alternative and attractive pathway for seed BH formation is via the so-called direct collapse (e.g., Bromm & Loeb 2003), where a supermassive star (SMS) with ∼ 10 5 M collapses into a BH with a similar mass by general relativistic instability (Umeda et al 2016;Woods et al 2017;Haemmerlé et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can grow SMBHs in the available time if either with continuous accretion at the Eddington limit or with short episode of super-Eddington growth. In reality, E-mail: r.matsukoba@astr.tohoku.ac.jp however, the BH's growth can easily be hindered by its own radiative feedback (Milosavljević et al 2009;Park & Ricotti 2011;Sugimura et al 2018;Orofino et al 2018). An alternative and attractive pathway for seed BH formation is via the so-called direct collapse (e.g., Bromm & Loeb 2003), where a supermassive star (SMS) with ∼ 10 5 M collapses into a BH with a similar mass by general relativistic instability (Umeda et al 2016;Woods et al 2017;Haemmerlé et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seeding prescriptions employing stellar mass BH (M• < ∼ 10 2 M ) seeds are known to face difficulties in explaining the observed 10 9 M SMBHs at z = 6 (Alvarez et al 2009;Orofino et al 2018). Such models have to resort to prolonged super-Eddington accretion phases (Madau et al 2014;Volonteri et al 2015;Aversa et al 2015;Lupi et al 2016;Regan et al 2019;Takeo et al 2020), in contrast with models in which radiation pressure regulates gas infall, such as e.g.…”
Section: Seedingmentioning
confidence: 99%