2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.seares.2004.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth physiology and fate of diatoms in the ocean: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

44
482
6
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 638 publications
(536 citation statements)
references
References 190 publications
44
482
6
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Diatoms exhibit the highest sensitivity to Fe limitation (Miller et al, 1991;Morel et al, 1991) with shifts to larger sizes (>10 m) in response to Fe fertilisation (De Baar et al, 2005). Experiments carried out with cultured diatoms in the laboratory showed a relationship between Fe, the surface/volume ratio (S/V) and the iron biological requirement for growth (De Baar et al, 2005;Timmermans et al, 2004;Sarthou et al, 2005), with larger diatoms being associated with greater iron requirement. Therefore, Fe bioavailability is not only influenced by its chemical forms, but also by the different uptake strategies, biological requirements and interactions of the phyto-and bacterio-plankton communities (e.g., Barbeau et al, 1996;Hutchins et al, 1999).…”
Section: Iron (Fe) Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Diatoms exhibit the highest sensitivity to Fe limitation (Miller et al, 1991;Morel et al, 1991) with shifts to larger sizes (>10 m) in response to Fe fertilisation (De Baar et al, 2005). Experiments carried out with cultured diatoms in the laboratory showed a relationship between Fe, the surface/volume ratio (S/V) and the iron biological requirement for growth (De Baar et al, 2005;Timmermans et al, 2004;Sarthou et al, 2005), with larger diatoms being associated with greater iron requirement. Therefore, Fe bioavailability is not only influenced by its chemical forms, but also by the different uptake strategies, biological requirements and interactions of the phyto-and bacterio-plankton communities (e.g., Barbeau et al, 1996;Hutchins et al, 1999).…”
Section: Iron (Fe) Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the remote SO where external sources of Fe are limited, Fe recycling is efficient, providing 20-100% of the Fe required to sustain phytoplankton growth (Hutchins et al, 1993;Poorvin et al, 2004;Strzepek et al, 2005;Sarthou et al, 2005). Remineralisation of particulate Fe at depth mediated by heterotrophic bacteria can also release Fe and ligands , thus potentially affecting Fe bioavailability to primary producers.…”
Section: Iron (Fe) Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diatoms, commonly found throughout the ocean, produce rigid external cell walls (or exoskeletons) formed from hydrated amorphous silica and range in diameters from 10-150 μm [117,118]. Despite their often microscopic size, the sheer biomass of diatoms causes them to account for 40% of the primary production of carbon [119] and the majority of biogenic silica (silica transformed from dissolved silicate into skeletal material) [120] in the oceans. While diatoms often exhibit simple geometric profiles (Fig.…”
Section: Diatom and Coccolithophore Exoskeletonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ratio is significantly higher than the average Si:N ratio of diatoms, which is closer to 1 (Brzezinski, 1985), and supports the observation of heavily silicified diatoms. This ratio can also increase due to stresses on diatom growth, such as light, macro-, or micronutrient limitation (Hutchins and Bruland, 1998;Saito et al, 2002;Sarthou et al, 2005). Since the concentration of macronutrients remains well above the half saturation constants of ~1 μM for DIN and ~3 μM for dSi, we consider light or iron limitation as more likely causes for enhanced silicification (Boyd et al, this volume).…”
Section: K2 Nutrient Drawdown and Export Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%