1988
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth periodization in mental test performance.

Abstract: Epstein proposed that the brain and mental ability grow in spurts, specifically at 3-10 months and 2-4, 6-8,10-12 or 13, and 14-16 or 17 years of age, and that new concepts and skills should be taught primarily during the spurts, not during the plateaus. The mental test data cited by Epstein to support his theory are reanalyzed in this article. Only two studies provided any statistically significant relation with the theory. Tn one, the age changes were partly confounded with differences in test forms. In the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, he questioned the validity and usefulness of brain measurements (i.e., inferred from skull circumference) and their application in the design of educational programs. Epstein (1974aEpstein ( , 1986 and McCall (1988;McCall et al, 1983) opened important discussions concerning the applicability of modern neuroscience data in the design of educational programs. It is clear that both identified critical issues that make the relationships between brain and mental growth difficult to interpret.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, he questioned the validity and usefulness of brain measurements (i.e., inferred from skull circumference) and their application in the design of educational programs. Epstein (1974aEpstein ( , 1986 and McCall (1988;McCall et al, 1983) opened important discussions concerning the applicability of modern neuroscience data in the design of educational programs. It is clear that both identified critical issues that make the relationships between brain and mental growth difficult to interpret.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to William J. Hudspeth, Center for Brain Research, Department of Psychology, Radford University, Radford, Virginia 24124. test measurements do not provide sufficiently detailed information concerning brain or cognitive growth to warrant prospective decisions. Resolution of the issues raised by Epstein (1974Epstein ( , 1986 and McCall (1988;McCall et al, 1983) might well be found in direct measurements of regional brain growth and specific cognitive skills that emphasize the neuropsychological dependencies we assume in brain-cognition correlations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group IQ growth rate patterns do not (McCall, 1988a), and whereas individual IQ and mental age profiles show inflections at 5-6, 10-12, and perhaps at 14-15 years of age {McCall et al, 1973;McCall et al, 1983), not all of these points are at hypothesized peak periods and some children display increases and some display decreases at these ages. Epstein (1990) criticized my (McCall, 1988a) review of this literature on several methodological grounds. For one thing, I reanalyzed data involving a great variety of mental abilities, and Epstein states that it is an error to expect that all measures of mental performance should reveal the same general periodicity function.…”
Section: Brain Growth Periodicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Are these data similarly "flawed"? Misrepresentation A final major concern of Epstein (1990) is that I (McCall, 1988a) incorrectly attributed to him extreme claims for the theory and its potential application to educational contexts. Epstein particularly wishes to disassociate himself from the "extravagant claims" of Toepfer (e.g., Toepfer, 1979) and Hart (1981).…”
Section: Brain Growth Periodicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation