2014
DOI: 10.3923/jfas.2014.468.472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth Performance of Juvenile Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) Fed Ipomoea aquatica Based Diets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SGR range of 4.01 to 4.35 (%/day) recorded in the study is significantly greater than the range of 2.71 to 3.19 (%/day) reported by Agokei et al (2010) and 2.30 to 2.84 (%/day) reported by Odulate et al (2014) for juveniles of the same species. This disparity could be attributed to variability in diets used and study duration.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SGR range of 4.01 to 4.35 (%/day) recorded in the study is significantly greater than the range of 2.71 to 3.19 (%/day) reported by Agokei et al (2010) and 2.30 to 2.84 (%/day) reported by Odulate et al (2014) for juveniles of the same species. This disparity could be attributed to variability in diets used and study duration.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Also the difference in SGR could be attributed to the difference feeding frequency used. The three times feeding per day used in this study was more appropriate (Aderolu et al, 2010); when compared to the one and two times used by Agokei et al (2010) and Odulate et al (2014), respectively. This study recorded better weight gain in the treatment that Values on the same row with the same superscript are not significantly different was administered more of the daily ration in the evening compared to the treatment where equal rations were fed to the fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The result from this study was also in agreement with the observation by Paguia et al (2014) who established that using different amounts of Moringa oleifera leaf meal (0 %, 0.2 %, 0.3 %, 0.4 %, 0.5 %) in broiler and layer ration, did not significantly influence the broiler' feed intake, weight gain, final body weight and FCR, and also had non-significant effects on feed consumption, FCR and egg production in layer chickens. It seemed that the incorporation levels of leaf meals did not affect the palatability of the diets (Odulate et al, 2014). Nguyen Thi Thuy and Ogle (2005) also suggested that the lack of effect of the green feeds on growth rate, feed conversion and meat quality was probably due to the fact that the basal diet was already well balanced in major nutrients.…”
Section: Growth Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar observation by Tagoe et al (2014) who reported that broiler offered Alternanthera sessilis leaf meal supplement at 0.5 % level of inclusion compared favourably with the control, while high levels (0.75 %, 1 % and 1.25 %) supplementation had negative effect on growth performance. The lower growth response was probably caused by reduced palatability of the diet which causes reduction in feed intake (Odulate et al, 2014). Ghazalah and Ali (2008) who suggested that the decrease in growth as dietary leaf meal increased could be caused by the high crude fibre content in particular cellulose from the cell walls of leaf meal, which may impede the utilization of nutrients by chicks.…”
Section: Growth Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation