1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8644(199801)105:1<57::aid-ajpa6>3.0.co;2-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth patterns in the modern human skeleton

Abstract: This study investigates cross sectional growth patterns in the human skeleton using a recent skeletal sample of known age and sex. Measurements were selected to reflect different functional regions of the cranium, mandible and post cranial skeleton, and growth is evaluated using a single phase Gompertz curve. Different parts of the skeleton vary in the proportion of adult size attained at birth and in their subsequent rate of attainment of adult size. The paper introduces a method for the objective and quantit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
158
1
11

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(14 reference statements)
20
158
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…As we say in the study of the ischium [2], the age that growth stature ceased was fixed for practical reasons [16,34] and shows the end of most notable growth, certain segments continue growing [22]. These results agree with the opinion that the innominate ceases its growth later than the long bones [35,36].…”
Section: U N C O R R E C T E D P R O O Fsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…As we say in the study of the ischium [2], the age that growth stature ceased was fixed for practical reasons [16,34] and shows the end of most notable growth, certain segments continue growing [22]. These results agree with the opinion that the innominate ceases its growth later than the long bones [35,36].…”
Section: U N C O R R E C T E D P R O O Fsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In this sense, the three cranial components differ in their embryological origin, mode of ossification and pattern of growth (Morriss-Kay, 2001;McBratney-Owen et al, 2008). Particularly, the cranial base follows a growth pattern characterized by a rapid early size increase, whereas the facial skeleton follows the general pattern of somatic growth and attains its final size at an older age (Humphrey, 1998;Scheuer and Black, 2000;Sperber, 2001). The differences in timing among the modules can explain the discrepancies in the strength of the ontogentic allometric pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malnutrition and illness can delay the physical onset of puberty, 51,55,56 which may result in persons appearing younger than they are based on pubertal development, thus resulting in an underestimation of actual chronological age. Conversely, the average age of the onset of puberty in females from the Indian subcontinent has been shown to occur slightly earlier (by 0.2-0.8 years compared to Caucasian females); 57,58 this would result in the overestimation of chronological age of the Indian children if they were assessed according to Caucasian developmental norms.…”
Section: Psychological Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%