1990
DOI: 10.1097/00004703-199010000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth Parameters and Attention to Faces at 4 to 6 Months of Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, this account must be considered in any study that finds a correlation between a measure of physiological maturity at birth (e.g., gestational length, weight, length, or head circumference) and an outcome measure. In fact, there is a sizeable literature showing that different aspects of physiological maturity at birth predict visual performance (visual orienting at 2 to 5 months: Dannemiller, 2004; attention to faces at 4 to 6 months: Camp, Jamieson-Darr, Hansen, & Schmidt, 1990; visual recognition memory from 5 to 12 months: Rose, 1994) and non-visual performance (language and gross movement at 4 years: Ounsted, Moar, & Scott, 1984; IQ in childhood: Churchill, 1965; Jefferis, Power, & Hertzman, 2002; Matte, Bresnahan, Begg, & Susser, 2001; Scarr, 1969). Analyses that control for prenatal environment factors will help determine whether correlations observed between physiological measures of maturity at birth and later visual performance (as in the current and previous studies) are driven by these factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, this account must be considered in any study that finds a correlation between a measure of physiological maturity at birth (e.g., gestational length, weight, length, or head circumference) and an outcome measure. In fact, there is a sizeable literature showing that different aspects of physiological maturity at birth predict visual performance (visual orienting at 2 to 5 months: Dannemiller, 2004; attention to faces at 4 to 6 months: Camp, Jamieson-Darr, Hansen, & Schmidt, 1990; visual recognition memory from 5 to 12 months: Rose, 1994) and non-visual performance (language and gross movement at 4 years: Ounsted, Moar, & Scott, 1984; IQ in childhood: Churchill, 1965; Jefferis, Power, & Hertzman, 2002; Matte, Bresnahan, Begg, & Susser, 2001; Scarr, 1969). Analyses that control for prenatal environment factors will help determine whether correlations observed between physiological measures of maturity at birth and later visual performance (as in the current and previous studies) are driven by these factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birth weight and head circumference are correlated (Crawford, Doyle, & Meadows, 1987;Nishi et al, 1992), and head circumference at birth reflects the rate of head growth in utero (Sheth, Mullett, Bodensteiner, & Hobbs, 1995). Childhood IQ and attention in infancy are not just related to birth weight, but also to head circumference at birth (Camp et al, 1990;Ounsted et al, 1984). To the extent that head circumference is an indirect measure of brain size, then this association between birth weight and later cognition may reflect the physiological maturity of the brain at birth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Camp et al (1990) study, boys typically showed longer initial fixation times than girls; longer fixation times are usually associated with less mature attentional processing. The relation between birth weight and later IQ is stronger in males than in females (Matte et al, 2001), although the gender difference in this relation is not seen in all samples (e.g., Jefferis et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%