Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0248(98)00113-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of ε-caprolactam crystals from the melt: The influence of cyclohexanone on the {111̄} and {110} forms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of water on the melt crystallization of ε-caprolactam has been studied , as this is another important impurity that affects the performance of the resulting crystalline product but, more particularly, because melt crystallization as a route for purification is greatly preferable to the existing, energy-intensive, multistage distillation process for the purification of caprolactam. The effect of cyclohexanone as an impurity has also been studied. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The impact of water on the melt crystallization of ε-caprolactam has been studied , as this is another important impurity that affects the performance of the resulting crystalline product but, more particularly, because melt crystallization as a route for purification is greatly preferable to the existing, energy-intensive, multistage distillation process for the purification of caprolactam. The effect of cyclohexanone as an impurity has also been studied. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differential binding energies for the forms {200}, {110}, and {111̄}, as reported in Table , are very similar. In the case of cyclohexanone as an impurity in the growth of ε-caprolactam from the melt, experimentally measured segregation coefficients are available for the {110} and {111̄} forms . The value of the equilibrium segregation coefficient calculated for the {110} form at 298 K is 4.2 × 10 -3 and at 342 K (the melting point of pure ε-caprolactam) is 8.4 × 10 -3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%