2017
DOI: 10.1112/blms.12082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of the number of periodic points for meromorphic maps

Abstract: We show that any dominant meromorphic self-map f of a compact Kaehler manifold X is an Artin-Mazur map. More precisely, if P_n(f) is the number of its isolated periodic points of period n (counted with multiplicity), then P_n(f) grows at most exponentially fast with respect to n and the exponential rate is at most equal to the algebraic entropy of f. Further estimates are given when X is a surface. Among the techniques introduced in this paper, the h-dimension of the density between two arbitrary positive clos… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first have the following general result recently obtained in [24]. Theorem 5.1 (Dinh-Nguyen-Truong).…”
Section: Number Of Isolated Periodic Points and Equidistributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first have the following general result recently obtained in [24]. Theorem 5.1 (Dinh-Nguyen-Truong).…”
Section: Number Of Isolated Periodic Points and Equidistributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, if f is a polynomial map, the cardinality of Per 0 n f is bounded by the degree of f n , which grows at most exponentially fast (see the generalization [18]). The first study in the C ∞ -case goes back to Artin and Mazur [2], who proved the existence of a dense set D in Diff ∞ (M ) formed by diffeomorphisms f such that the cardinality of Per 0 n f grows at most exponentially fast:…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note a parallel between the least negative intersection and the tangent currents in this situation. Under the same assumptions as in Theorem 4.2, it was shown in our joint paper [8] that the h-dimension (defined in [10]) between T + and T − is 0, the best possible.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 87%