1978
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1097(78)90042-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of the methane utilising bacterium Methylococcus NCIB 11083 in mineral salts medium with methanol as the sole source of carbon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, other workers have demonstrated the retention of methane-oxidizing activity in Type I methylotrophs (Linton & Vokes, 1978;Hyder et al, 1979). Our results contrast with those obtained by Hou et al.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, other workers have demonstrated the retention of methane-oxidizing activity in Type I methylotrophs (Linton & Vokes, 1978;Hyder et al, 1979). Our results contrast with those obtained by Hou et al.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Despite the widely reported toxicity of methanol to obligate methylotrophs (Leadbetter & Foster, 1958;Stocks & McCleskey, 1964;Whittenbury et al, 1970a), growth on methanol at high concentrations is clearly possible for Methylocystis parvus OBBP (up to 4%, w/v; Hou et al, 1979a), MethyZococcus NCIB 11083 (up to 0-2%, v/v; Linton & Vokes, 1978), and Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b (up to 4%, v/v; this paper). The mechanism by which these organisms adapt to growth on methanol at high concentrations is unknown but may reflect physiological adaptation of the population to the substrate or the selection of a mutant resistant to either methanol or formaldehyde.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A45. Methylocystis parvus OBBP was adapted to growth on methanol in chemostat culture as previously described (Linton & Vokes 1978;Prior & Dalton 1985). The methanol adapted strain is called M. parvus OBBPM.…”
Section: Strains and Growth Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an intermediate value could also have arisen from a low level of ammonia oxidation by the MMO which would serve to decrease the observed yield and increase the effective O2/CH4 ratio. Using Methylococcus NCIB 11083, a strain which responds to copper stress in an identical fashion to M. capsulatus (Bath) (Leak and Dalton, unpublished resuits), Linton and Vokes (1978) measured a CCE value of 46--47.8% in a similar growth medium under methane limitation. Their copper to biomass ratio was considerably lower than that utilized by Leak and Dalton (1986) thus reducing the potential contribution from particulate MMO.…”
Section: Soluble Mmomentioning
confidence: 99%