1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-7757(98)00266-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of rod-like micelles in anionic surfactant solutions in the presence of Ca2+ counterions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
71
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
10
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, some micelles passed through the membrane increasing the permeate Cd 2+ concentration. It is supposed that beyond the second cmc (about 7.0 cmc), spherical micelles associate to build so-called "rodlike" aggregates that pass through the membrane with metal ions [34][35][36].…”
Section: Single Removal Of CD 2+mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, some micelles passed through the membrane increasing the permeate Cd 2+ concentration. It is supposed that beyond the second cmc (about 7.0 cmc), spherical micelles associate to build so-called "rodlike" aggregates that pass through the membrane with metal ions [34][35][36].…”
Section: Single Removal Of CD 2+mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of D and P m for all surfactant systems studied herein rise continuously with the incremental concentrations of single surfactant systems and the addition of Brij35. Obviously, the size of micelles and the aggregation number enhance with the increasing concentration of surfactant and the Brij35/CG molar ratio α, namely, the number of surfactant molecules or in the micellar phase increase, and more binding sites between phenol and surfactant micelles enlarge [3,[32][33][34][35][36], which could be observed from higher D in Fig. 2.…”
Section: Calculated Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. It could be explained as followed: when the feed surfactant concentration increased, more micelles formed in the solution [32][33][34][35][36], which means the number of surfactant molecules entered the micellar phase (higher S m ), thus the free phenol in the water phase accordingly reduced. As for the mixed surfactant system, the right figure showed that S m values are approximate to each other and enhance slowly when the Brij35/CG molar ratios α varies from 0 to 1.2.…”
Section: Calculated Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, the mixture of surfactants often has better ability to modify the interfacial properties and to generate high foam volume than those of the individual interfacially active compounds and also the mixtures are advantageous because the purification of a single compound may be very expensive and difficult [5][6][7][8][9]. The mixture of two different surfactant types exhibit synergism or cooperative interaction and they can also produce unique microstructures like vesicles and rod-like micelles which are useful in certain applications [10][11][12][13][14]. However, mixed surfactant systems have the limitation that they form crystalline precipitates in aqueous solution as a result of the coulombic interaction between oppositely charged species [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%