1985
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.98639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of ponderosa pine thinned to different stocking levels in northern Arizona /

Abstract: A dense, immature ponderosa pine stand was thinned in 1962, 1972, and 1982 to six growing stock levels (30, 60, 80, 100, 120, and 150). Except for height, average tree growth characteristics (diameter, crown length, and width) were negatively correlated with residual stand density. Stand basal area and volume increment were positively related to stand density.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Volume (V) at the start of each period and V 2 were used as covariates in the analysis of volume PAI. These covariates were derived from studies documenting relations between tree growth and density (Miller and Tarrant, 1983;Ronco et al, 1985;Oliver and Edminster, 1988). sured in 1994, followed similar trends to that of shrub cover (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volume (V) at the start of each period and V 2 were used as covariates in the analysis of volume PAI. These covariates were derived from studies documenting relations between tree growth and density (Miller and Tarrant, 1983;Ronco et al, 1985;Oliver and Edminster, 1988). sured in 1994, followed similar trends to that of shrub cover (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stand is ;35.6 ha in area (Ronco et al 1985), and is dominated by ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa var. The stand is ;35.6 ha in area (Ronco et al 1985), and is dominated by ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa var.…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thinning of these forests is effective in increasing individual tree growth (Ronco et al, 1985;Feeney et al, 1998;Skov et al, 2005), decreasing tree water stress Skov et al, 2004;Wallin et al, 2004), increasing tree defense against bark beetles through increased resin production , and increasing leaf nitrogen concentration and hence photosynthetic capacity in some cases (Feeney et al, 1998;Wallin et al, 2004). The few long-term studies of prescribed burning in Arizona ponderosa pine forests suggest that frequent burning can impact tree nitrogen and water relations, and growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%