1997
DOI: 10.1051/limn/1997021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth ofCyclotella meneghinianaKutz. II. Growth and cell composition under different growth rates with different limiting nutrient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimum nitrogen and phosphorus mass ratio (N:P ratio) for M. aeruginosa, which was defined as the ratio between the minimum cell quota of nitrate and phosphorus, has been reported as 3.8 (Rhee and Gotham 1980). On the other hand, Shafik et al (1997) indicated that the optimum N:P ratio for Cyclotella meneghiniana was 5.8. From these reports, the N:P ratio of 3.8 and 5.8 were assumed to be an optimum for M. aeruginosa and Cyclotella sp., respectively, and are illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimum nitrogen and phosphorus mass ratio (N:P ratio) for M. aeruginosa, which was defined as the ratio between the minimum cell quota of nitrate and phosphorus, has been reported as 3.8 (Rhee and Gotham 1980). On the other hand, Shafik et al (1997) indicated that the optimum N:P ratio for Cyclotella meneghiniana was 5.8. From these reports, the N:P ratio of 3.8 and 5.8 were assumed to be an optimum for M. aeruginosa and Cyclotella sp., respectively, and are illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limpens and Berendse (2003) found that the strength of homeostasis may change as a long-term adaptation to site fertility. Furthermore, data from algae suggest that even growth rate itself could be associated with stoichiometric homeostasis (Elrifi and Turpin 1985;Shafik et al 1997;Persson et al 2010), as the relatively constrained biochemical allocations required under fast growth might constrain biomass N:P within a narrow range under situations that permit high growth rates. Similar H values of species within a given functional group and significant differences of H among functional groups suggest that life …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 and 3) is reproducible when sufficient agents are used to represent the population . Oliver et al (1981); h Typical value (range), Thomann and Mueller (1987), 20°C, p. 420, l MAX , p. 428; i Tilman and Kilham (1976), l MAX , V net,MAX ; j Shafik et al (1997a), l MAX ; k Shafik et al (1997b), l MAX ; l Sommer (1998), p. 79;m Shuter (1978); n Converted using q C = 5.7-300 fmol C lm -3 (Shafik et al 1997b); o Converted using m = 0.78-4.3 pmol C cell -1 (our data); p Typical, Chapra (1997), p. 614; q Converted using m AVE = 2 ln(2) m 0 (Hellweger and Kianirad 2007) or h:d AVE = ln(2) h:d D ; r Iyengar and Subrahmanyan (1944); s 19 marine and estuarine diatoms, Mizuno (1991); t Cell size split fraction, Synechochoccus elongatus, Mihalcescu et al (2004); u For simulations with biological variability states only. See Table 2.…”
Section: Parameter Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Table 2. Applied to parameters common to Simulations S4, M1 and M2 (l P,MAX , q 0 , l R , k W ); y P-limited culture, Shafik et al (1997a), l D ; z Converted using l D = X Dead /X Alive 9 D (Brussaard et al 1997); A P-limited culture, Shafik et al (1997b), l D ; B Hellweger and Kianirad (2007); C Range of values summarized by Hellweger et al (2003), V net,MAX ; D For simulations with surface area-based uptake only. See Table 2; E A AVE = 250 lm 2 cell -1 , m AVE = 2.6 pmol C cell -1 , based on our data; F Morel (1987); G For simulations with P-dependent uptake only.…”
Section: Parameter Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation