1994
DOI: 10.1021/jf00038a045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth method for estimating the caloric availability of fats and oils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(23 reference statements)
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method is almost in line with the study of Finley et al (17), which is a modified version of the method adopted by Rice et al (32). The authors have tested the method by estimating the calorific availability of three fats (cocoa butter, tallow, and lard) and two simple esters (ethyl stearate and ethyl oleate).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The method is almost in line with the study of Finley et al (17), which is a modified version of the method adopted by Rice et al (32). The authors have tested the method by estimating the calorific availability of three fats (cocoa butter, tallow, and lard) and two simple esters (ethyl stearate and ethyl oleate).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The mean weight gains per gram of diet of all the test groups on restricted diet and also the pilot ad libitum group were recorded for each of the time intervals when body weights were recorded over the 21 d of the experiment and are given in Table 4, as are the slopes, intercepts and regression coefficients (r 2 ). Unlike the assay of Finley et al (17), we prolonged our experiment for 21 d. When mean body weight gain was regressed against 21 d of assay for all the groups, regression coefficients were greater than 0.987. This fulfills the first assumption of this assay.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations