2000
DOI: 10.1093/cep/18.3.334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth management and housing prices: the case of Portland, Oregon

Abstract: Portland, Oregon, is well known for its relatively unique urban growth boundary (UGB), a very tight form of zoning designed to control sprawl. The UGB has recently been criticized for raising housing prices. From a theoretical perspective, the UGB will put upward pressure on land and thus housing prices, but the magnitude of this effect is uncertain. Increasing density should substitute for higher land prices, partially offsetting any reduction in the supply of housing. In addition, at any given moment, specul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
54
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this it appears similar to the system of 'growth boundaries' adopted in Portland, Oregon in 1973. The evolution and impact of these on house prices was the focus of the study by Phillips and Goodstein (2000). As the paper by Irwin and Bockstael demonstrates, however, anti-sprawl policies can work in other ways as well.…”
Section: Estimating the Impact Of Land Use Planning And Zoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this it appears similar to the system of 'growth boundaries' adopted in Portland, Oregon in 1973. The evolution and impact of these on house prices was the focus of the study by Phillips and Goodstein (2000). As the paper by Irwin and Bockstael demonstrates, however, anti-sprawl policies can work in other ways as well.…”
Section: Estimating the Impact Of Land Use Planning And Zoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After decades of continuous growth and economic prosperity, it became clear that this growth has become unsustainable. This kind of persistent growth develops with the mindset of what short term benefits a community can achieve, while providing tax incentives to businesses in order to bring revenue into the community [1]. Although in the end, this whole concept is not cost efficient and the city is left with the implications of maintenance cost of deteriorating infrastructure [2].…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, as Phillips and Goodstein (2000) show in the case of Portland, OR, price effects could be linked to reduction in the size of new single-family homes and greater share of multifamily construction.…”
Section: When Additional Variables (Ln(mhvpci01) and Ln(mhvpcichr)) Amentioning
confidence: 99%