2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2014.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth kinetics of Al–Fe intermetallic compounds during annealing treatment of friction stir lap welds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The highly disturbed character of the interface makes it difficult to analyze the different phases. In addition, it is known that FeAl 3 first grows and then decreases due to the formation of Fe 2 Al 5 upon traditional welding [36]. Finally, it is also noticeable that the different compositions highlighted by EDS could reveal the existence of a more complex rich-FeAl 3 IMC, enriched in chromium, originating from the initial composition of the stainless steel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The highly disturbed character of the interface makes it difficult to analyze the different phases. In addition, it is known that FeAl 3 first grows and then decreases due to the formation of Fe 2 Al 5 upon traditional welding [36]. Finally, it is also noticeable that the different compositions highlighted by EDS could reveal the existence of a more complex rich-FeAl 3 IMC, enriched in chromium, originating from the initial composition of the stainless steel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition, it is known that FeAl3 first grows and then decreases due to the formation of Fe2Al5 upon traditional welding [36]. Finally, it is also noticeable that the different compositions highlighted by EDS could reveal the existence of a more complex rich-FeAl3 IMC, enriched in chromium, originating from the initial composition of the stainless steel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Majority of the literatures [15,[43][44][45][46][47] suggest that the correlation between intermetallic layer thickness, x (m) and hot-dipping time, t (s) for solid iron/liquid aluminum couples follows a "parabolic" rate equation:…”
Section: Kinetics Of Fe-al Intermetallic Layer Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%