2012
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth In US Health Spending Remained Slow In 2010; Health Share Of Gross Domestic Product Was Unchanged From 2009

Abstract: Medical goods and services are generally viewed as necessities. Even so, the latest recession had a dramatic effect on their utilization. US health spending grew more slowly in 2009 and 2010-at rates of 3.8 percent and 3.9 percent, respectively-than in any other years during the fifty-one-year history of the National Health Expenditure Accounts. In 2010 extraordinarily slow growth in the use and intensity of services led to slower growth in spending for personal health care. The rates of growth in overall US g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
90
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…26,27 Resources must be considered in relation to outcome achieved. The balance between outcomes and resources will look different depending on the perspective (Fig 2).…”
Section: Should Cost and Resource Use Influence Willingness To Providmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27 Resources must be considered in relation to outcome achieved. The balance between outcomes and resources will look different depending on the perspective (Fig 2).…”
Section: Should Cost and Resource Use Influence Willingness To Providmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar trend was seen in the United States (US) health economy [2]. Health care spending grew by 3.9 percent to an annual expenditure of $2.6 trillion or $8402 for each individual in 2010, equal to 17.9 percent of GDP [3]. The total expenditure for individual health care is approximately double the amount of other industrialized nations and has wiped out any real income gains over a decade for an average US family [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…La edad de los pacientes se agrupó en 4 categorías (paciente pediátrico (0-12 años), paciente adulto joven (13-44 años), paciente adulto maduro (45-64 años) y paciente anciano (≥ 65 años); de acuerdo a lo establecido por el Grupo Nacional de Estadísticas en Salud de Medicare y Medicaid (13). El diagnóstico médico se agrupó en 5 categorías de acuerdo a los objetivos del estudio (patología gastrointestinal, que incluyó gastritis, duodenitis, esofagitis, úlceras gástrica, duodenal, péptica y gastroyeyunal, enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE), varices esofágicas, gástricas y duodenales y cánceres del tracto gastrointestinal superior; patologías graves que incluyó septicemias, otros cánceres, hepatitis y otras hepatopatías, insuficiencia renal crónica y otras disfunciones renales, traumatismos graves y quemaduras graves; hipertensión arterial, diabetes mellitus y otros, para ello se utilizó la Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) en su décima versión (CIE-10).…”
Section: Materials Y Métodounclassified