2009
DOI: 10.1112/jlms/jdp058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth in the minimal injective resolution of a local ring

Abstract: Abstract. Let R be a commutative noetherian local ring with residue field k and assume that it is not Gorenstein. In the minimal injective resolution of R, the injective envelope E of the residue field appears as a summand in every degree starting from the depth of R. The number of copies of E in degree i equals the k-vector space dimension of the cohomology module Ext i R (k, R). These dimensions, known as Bass numbers, form an infinite sequence of invariants of R about which little is known. We prove that it… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The next result summarizes some of the points of Fact 2.6. It is almost certainly well-known to the experts, in light of [5,17], Corollary 2.7. The following conditions on the local ring R are equivalent.…”
Section: Background On Local Ringsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The next result summarizes some of the points of Fact 2.6. It is almost certainly well-known to the experts, in light of [5,17], Corollary 2.7. The following conditions on the local ring R are equivalent.…”
Section: Background On Local Ringsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The rings of Theorems A and B have decomposable maximal ideals, which means that they are realized as non-trivial fiber products; see Fact 2.1 below. Such rings have very rigid homological properties, as one sees, e.g., in [5,16,17,21,23]. For instance, they satisfy (UAC), they have at most the two trivial semidualizing modules, they are G-regular, and they satisfy the Auslander-Reiten Conjecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For rings of minimal multiplicity, it is straightforward to answer this question: reduce to the case where m 2 = 0 and show that β R i (ω R ) = (r 2 − 1)r i−1 for all i 1; here r is the Cohen-Macaulay type of R. (See Example 2.4 below.) This question has been answered in the affirmative for other classes of rings by Jorgensen and Leuschke [15] and Christensen, Striuli and Veliche [8]. These classes include the classes of Golod rings, rings with codimension at most 3, rings that are one link from a complete intersection, rings with m 3 = 0, Teter rings, and nontrivial fiber product rings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There are several works which were motivated by the following questions of Huneke about the Bass numbers µ i R (R) = rank k (Ext i R (k, R)). For instance, see [3], [5], [12] and [15]. However, each of the following questions is still open in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%