2015
DOI: 10.1111/cge.12632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth in neurofibromatosis 1 microdeletion patients

Abstract: Microdeletions of the entire NF1 gene and surrounding genomic region occur in about 5% of patients with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1). NF1 microdeletion patients usually have more cutaneous and plexiform neurofibromas and a higher risk of developing malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors than other people with NF1. Somatic overgrowth has also been observed in NF1 microdeletion patients, an observation that is remarkable because most NF1 patients are smaller than average for age and sex. We studied longitudinal m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study of 21 patients with type-1 NF1 microdeletions, overgrowth was most evident in preschool children (2–6 years, n  = 10) (Spiegel et al 2005). These findings were confirmed by Ning et al (2016) who performed longitudinal growth measurements in 56 NF patients with NF1 microdeletions and 226 NF1 patients with intragenic NF1 mutations. Most height measurements in 2–18-year-old boys and girls with NF1 microdeletions were greater than the median observed in non-deletion NF1 patients.…”
Section: Genotype–phenotype Relationships In Patients With Nf1 Microdsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In a study of 21 patients with type-1 NF1 microdeletions, overgrowth was most evident in preschool children (2–6 years, n  = 10) (Spiegel et al 2005). These findings were confirmed by Ning et al (2016) who performed longitudinal growth measurements in 56 NF patients with NF1 microdeletions and 226 NF1 patients with intragenic NF1 mutations. Most height measurements in 2–18-year-old boys and girls with NF1 microdeletions were greater than the median observed in non-deletion NF1 patients.…”
Section: Genotype–phenotype Relationships In Patients With Nf1 Microdsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…More appropriate would have been a methodical comparative analysis of a large number of age-matched patients with and without germline type-1 NF1 deletions investigated by standardised analytical tools. Although such comparative analyses have been attempted to assess differences in height (Ning et al 2016), cognitive capability (Descheemaeker et al 2004) or the frequency of cardiovascular anomalies (Nguyen et al 2013), they have not as yet been performed methodically in the context of the number of neurofibromas and other NF1 microdeletion-associated clinical features.…”
Section: Genotype–phenotype Relationships In Patients With Nf1 Microdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A prevalence of GH deficiency of 2.5% has been reported (Cnossen et al, ) and the loss of a critical role of neurofibromin in hypothalamic‐pituitary axis function was hypothesized as the pathogenic basis of this phenomenon (Hegedus et al, ). By contrast, mild somatic overgrowth has been observed in some NF1 microdeletion patients (Ning et al, ). In children with NF1 and OPG, central precocious puberty (CPP), leading to transient rapid growth with reduced final height, is considered the most common endocrinopathy (Habiby, Silverman, Listernick, & Charrow, 1995) and only few cases of GH excess (GHE), mainly associated to CPP, have been reported (Costin, Fefferman, & Kogut, ; Crawford & Buckler, ; Duchowny, Katz, & Bejar, ; Manski, Haworth, Duval‐Arnould, & Rushing, ; Fuqua & Berkovitz, ; Drimmie et al, ; Drake, Lowis, Bouffet, & Crowne, ; Main, Sehested, & Feldt‐Rasmussen, ; Josefson, Listernick, Fangusaro, Charrow, & Habiby, ; Bruzzi, Sani, & Albanese, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%