2006
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth in literacy and cognition in bilingual children at risk or not at risk for reading disabilities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
84
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
9
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of the present study are in line with those of Seidman, Biederman, Doyle, and Faraone (2001), Semrud-Clikeman et al (1992), Swanson et al (2006), and Swanson and Jerman (2007). Swanson, Ashbaker, andLee (2000 qtd.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings of the present study are in line with those of Seidman, Biederman, Doyle, and Faraone (2001), Semrud-Clikeman et al (1992), Swanson et al (2006), and Swanson and Jerman (2007). Swanson, Ashbaker, andLee (2000 qtd.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…A number of researches including Seidman, Biderman, Doyle & Faran (2001), Seidman (2006), Swanson et al (2006), and Swanson and Jerman (2007) have shown that children with learning disabilities have lower performance in comparison with normal children in achievement, learning, and attention tests. Other studies have also pointed out that neurological deficiencies such as performance and attention disorders in pre-primary school children continue to exist at later ages and challenge the children in doing homework and personal tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumour stabilization has frequently been observed in patients with GEP tumours treated with somatostatin analogues, and has also been reported in various series of progressive neuroendocrine tumours [16,22,23,24,25]. Indeed, a better and longer sustained response has been achieved in slow-growing tumours, with a 76% response at a median time of 11 months in 1 study [23], a 86% response at a median time of 25 months in another [16] and a 38% response at a median time of 50 months in another [15]. Moreover, somatostatin treatment has always been reported to be effective in decreasing the rate of tumour growth, although it was less effective with fast-growing tumours and not sufficient to inhibit aggressive tumour behaviour [15, 16, 23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In controlled studies, this effect was focused primarily on patients with functioning GEP tumours, and was reported to be a very rare event (about 5% of cases) regardless of the dosage or formulation of the drug [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Tumour stabilization has frequently been observed in patients with GEP tumours treated with somatostatin analogues, and has also been reported in various series of progressive neuroendocrine tumours [16,22,23,24,25]. Indeed, a better and longer sustained response has been achieved in slow-growing tumours, with a 76% response at a median time of 11 months in 1 study [23], a 86% response at a median time of 25 months in another [16] and a 38% response at a median time of 50 months in another [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation