2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth, fruit yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as affected by deficit irrigation regulated on phenological basis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

27
85
2
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
27
85
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 11 Total soluble solids, vitamin C, and titratable acidity for the different irrigation treatments Both RDI and PRD treatments had higher TSS concentrations than the FI treatment in both years, as shown in Figure 11. This agrees with the findings of various researchers [14,37,58] . TSS increasing could be due to a higher conversion of starch to sugars under water deficit [59] .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 11 Total soluble solids, vitamin C, and titratable acidity for the different irrigation treatments Both RDI and PRD treatments had higher TSS concentrations than the FI treatment in both years, as shown in Figure 11. This agrees with the findings of various researchers [14,37,58] . TSS increasing could be due to a higher conversion of starch to sugars under water deficit [59] .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This curtailed the transpiration water loss and increased WUE. The results were consistent with previous studies [14,39] , that showed lower T values under drought stress conditions in tomato plants.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In more recent studies and under more similar conditions, i.e., tomato cultivation in pots, WUE values higher than those presented by the above-mentioned authors have also been observed, such as in the study of Reina-Sánchez, Romero-Aranda and Cuartero (2005), who obtained a WUE of 25.0 kg m -3 . In general, the irrigation depth that promotes the greatest WUE is lower than the irrigation depth that promotes maximum yield (Nangare, Singh, Kumar, & Minhas, 2016), which justifies the use of deficit irrigation aiming at better WUE. However, this pattern was not observed in the present study because WUE was calculated based on the marketable yield, which was linearly influenced by the irrigation depths due to the losses caused by the incidence of fruits with blossom-end rot.…”
Section: Experiments II (2015) -Effect Of Water Deficitmentioning
confidence: 99%