2003
DOI: 10.1007/s100720300075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth factor analysis of low-grade glioma CSF: PDGF and VEGF are not detectable

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study did not find any significant difference between FGF level in the meningioma and glioma in comparison with the control group. Similarly, Ribom et al, (2003) also measured FGF-2, but at an extremely low concentrations in only 2 out of 7 patients. Consistent with the current study, Sun et al, (2010) showed significantly increased PDGFR-α and FGF-2 levels in recurrent tumors, and the important role of PDGFR-α and FGF-2 in the angiogenesis, and recurrent craniopharyngiomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Our study did not find any significant difference between FGF level in the meningioma and glioma in comparison with the control group. Similarly, Ribom et al, (2003) also measured FGF-2, but at an extremely low concentrations in only 2 out of 7 patients. Consistent with the current study, Sun et al, (2010) showed significantly increased PDGFR-α and FGF-2 levels in recurrent tumors, and the important role of PDGFR-α and FGF-2 in the angiogenesis, and recurrent craniopharyngiomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…VEGF was shown, nearly two decades ago, to be secreted by malignant brain tumors (19) and to be a measurable element of brain tumor angiogenesis (20). Even though the local release of VEGF was not reflected in the serum of brain tumor patients according to some groups (21) and not detectable in patients with low-grade glioma (22), others have shown that VEGF is often elevated in cancer in the presence of distant metastases (23) from epithelial tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it serves as a biologic marker for the diagnosis and evaluation of treatment response in leptomeningeal metastases [119] (class III) (Table 4). VEGF is not detectable in lower grade gliomas (grade 2) [120] (class III).…”
Section: Csf Markers With a Future Potential To Be Used In Clinical Rmentioning
confidence: 99%