Growth environment and organ specific variation in in-vitro cytoprotective activities of Picea mariana in PC12 cells exposed to glucose toxicity: a plant used for treatment of diabetes symptoms by the Cree of Eeyou Istchee (Quebec, Canada)

Abstract

Background The Cree of Eeyou Istchee (James Bay area of northern Quebec) suffer from a high rate of diabetes and its complications partly due to the introduction of the western lifestyle within their culture. As part of a search for alternative medicine based on traditional practice, this project evaluates the biological activity of Picea mariana (Mill.) Britton, Sterns & Poggenb. needle, bark, and cone, in preventing glucose toxicity to PC12-AC cells in vitro (a diabetic neurophathy model) and whether habitat and growth environment influence this activity. Methods Three different organs (needle, bark, and cone) of P. mariana were collected at different geographical locations and ecological conditions and their 80% ethanolic extracts were prepared. Extracts were then tested for their ability to protect PC12-AC cells from hyperglycaemic challenge at physiologically relevant concentrations of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 μg/mL. Folin-Ciocalteu method was used to determine the total phenolic content of P. mariana extracts. Results All extracts were well-tolerated in vitro exhibiting LD 50 of 25 μ g/mL or higher. Extracts from all tested organs showed a cytoprotective concentration-dependent response. Furthermore, the cytoprotective activity was habitat- and growth environment-dependent with plants grown in bog or forest habitats in coastal or inland environments exhibiting different cytoprotective efficacies. These differences in activity correlated with total phenolic content but not with antioxidant activity. In addition, this paper provides the first complete Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight (UPLC-QTOF) mass spectrometry analysis of Picea mariana ’s bark, needles and cones. Conclusions Together, these results provide further understanding of the cytoprotective activity of Canadian boreal forest plants identified by the Cree healers of Eeyou Istchee in a cell model of diabetic neuropathy. Their activity is relevant to diabetic peripheral neuropathic complications and shows that their properties can be optimized by harvesting in optimal growth environments. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12906-019-2550-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Phytochemicals and bioactive analysis of different sweet tea ( Lithocarpus litseifolius [Hance] Chun ) varieties

“…Interestingly, the PC12 cell showed high cell viability about 90% when treated with phloridzin and trilobatin at a concentration range of 0–500 μg/ml, which showed that the safety of L. litseifolius can be improved by removing impurities. Even though flavonoids (such as quercetin and kaempferol) could function to protect PC12 cells against the potential oxidative damage (Liu, Yu, Song, & Zhang, 2019), the presence of too many antioxidants can cause oxidation and thus decreasing in cell survival of L. litseifolius extracts (Downing et al, 2019). Collectively, our results suggested that it is safer to purify L. litseifolius before use.…”

Connecting plant species and natural products from the Canadian prairie ecological zone to biomedical knowledge

“…Uprety et al (2012) analyzed 49 publications related with the medicinal uses of North American Aboriginal people, including Canada's First Nations, Metis, and Inuit, and reported 546 medicinal plant taxa used by Aboriginal people of the Canadian boreal forest. The anti-diabetic properties of plants known to the Cree First Nations led to the isolation of several compounds including those with specific enzyme targets in glucose metabolism (Muhammad et al, 2012, Nistor Baldea et al, 2011, Shang et al, 2015, Downing et al, 2019. A study comparing anti-fungal activity of plants in Eastern Canada revealed a greater activity in extracts prepared from species identified by Traditional Knowledge when compared to those selected without ethnobotanical information (Jones et al, 2000).…”