1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5729(99)00004-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth, electronic, magnetic and spectroscopic properties of transition metals on graphite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
59
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
5
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we use k c = 0.038 N / m for the cantilever spring constant, as obtained by calibration, 11 and a Poisson's ratio of = 0.33. 10 From the electron microscopy image ͑see inset of Fig. 4͒, the halfopening angle of tip apex ␣ = 15°has been accurately determined.…”
Section: ͑1͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we use k c = 0.038 N / m for the cantilever spring constant, as obtained by calibration, 11 and a Poisson's ratio of = 0.33. 10 From the electron microscopy image ͑see inset of Fig. 4͒, the halfopening angle of tip apex ␣ = 15°has been accurately determined.…”
Section: ͑1͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 However, to the best of our knowledge, only a small number of reports have handled the magnetism of transition metal thin films on either graphite or graphene. 9,12,[16][17][18] In 1998, the theoretical calculations of Krüger et al demonstrated that the Fe, Co, and Ni monolayers on graphite are ferromagnetic. 19 In 1999, Edmonds et al reported a doubling of the orbital magnetic moment in nanoscale Fe clusters on highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) by using x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epitaxial growth of thin films on crystalline structures has been around for a long time [20][21][22]. Even before free standing graphene was obtained from the exfoliation method, surface science has driven the growth of single crystalline (but not truly monolayer or free standing), homogeneous growth of epitaxial graphite layers, as opposed to HOPG graphene, which has a polycrystalline structure resulting from in-plane azimuthal disorder [23][24][25]. As the optimization for epitaxial single layer graphene growth became feasible, several transfer methods appeared afterwards, making it possible to obtain free standing epitaxial graphene on desired substrates.…”
Section: Epitaxial Growth On Sicmentioning
confidence: 99%