Human Growth 1986
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-2101-9_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth Dynamics of Low-Birth-Weight Infants with Emphasis on the Perinatal Period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 illustrates the growth dynamics for all the birth weight categories of adequate-for-gestational-age preterm newborns, showing that weight gain velocity, when expressed as g kg -1 day -1 , is inversely proportional to birth weight. There was a clear trend for lower birth weight infants to approximate and reach the weight of larger newborns, in agreement with literature data (20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 6 illustrates the growth dynamics for all the birth weight categories of adequate-for-gestational-age preterm newborns, showing that weight gain velocity, when expressed as g kg -1 day -1 , is inversely proportional to birth weight. There was a clear trend for lower birth weight infants to approximate and reach the weight of larger newborns, in agreement with literature data (20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is clear that the highest birth weight group (curve 7), which was also the group of neonates that lost less weight (5.9%), had the lowest relative weight gain peak (11.5 g kg -1 day -1 ). Certainly, due to their birth weight, gestational age and clinical progression, their growth dynamics was closer to that of term infants (20). Yet, on the 12th week, there was a converging movement of all curves, with weight gain ranging from 10.2 g kg -1 day -1 to 7.5 g kg -1 day -1 in the lower or higher weight categories, respectively, and low birth weight infants tended to get closer to and achieve the weight of larger infants, as also reported in the literature (20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the sixth week onwards, there is a deceleration in rates of weight increase, with the values of these rates drawing together at the end of the study (12th week), probably translating into smaller newborns, after a period of acceleration catching up and maintaining a growth rate similar to that of the larger ones. 6,[25][26][27] The analysis of the rate of head circumference increase, both in cm/week ( Figure 4) and in cm/m/week ( Figure 5) is very similar. In both the increase in head circumference is inversely proportional to birth weight, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…With respect of head circumference growth velocity, there is an increase in head circumference velocity for the smaller newborn babies until a peak is reached, from which there is a gradual reduction Velocity (cm/m/week) Growth velocity of preterm newborns Anchieta LM et alii in velocity, although there are differences of opinion over the timing of this peak and whether it varies or not with gestational age. 25,28,29 For length, it is only with relative velocity (Figure 7) that it can be observed that length gain (cm/m/week) is inversely proportional to birth weight. The length rate curves 1, 2, 3 and 4 increase until the fourth and fifth weeks, and, after a period of constant values, begin to drop off, and at the end of the study these curves tend to run together.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation