2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.12.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth delay analysis of heat-injured Salmonella Enteritidis in ground beef by real-time PCR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For heat treatment, the evaluated proportion of heat injured cells had an increasing trend with increasing treatment time (0–150 min). Kawasaki et al (2018) have reported similar results for Salmonella Enteritidis in PBS and ground beef at 52.5°C for 0–60 min. As is shown in Figure 2 , the TICC values of heat, LA and BC induced injured L. monocytogenes cells were only 35.20, 36.60, and 20.89%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For heat treatment, the evaluated proportion of heat injured cells had an increasing trend with increasing treatment time (0–150 min). Kawasaki et al (2018) have reported similar results for Salmonella Enteritidis in PBS and ground beef at 52.5°C for 0–60 min. As is shown in Figure 2 , the TICC values of heat, LA and BC induced injured L. monocytogenes cells were only 35.20, 36.60, and 20.89%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…It is well known that compared to uninjured cells, injured cells can present the extension of lag time due to the resuscitation behavior, so the lag time length of injured cells might be useful for evaluating the degree of sublethal injury. Kawasaki et al (2018) described the growth delay time (GDT, the difference of λ value between treated and non-treated cells) of Salmonella Enteritidis by real-time PCR monitoring assay, which was then compared with traditional culture method. Results showed that calculated percentage of injured cells was 100% during 24–48 min treatment since bacterial colonies were not detected on selective medium.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite such measures, some pathogenic bacteria have been reported to survive in an attenuated form by activating certain survival mechanisms, such as developing cross-protection under environmental stresses and facilitating a subsequent resumption of growth (Chambliss et al 2006). Considering the potential risk posed by injured bacteria, Kawasaki et al (2018) developed a rapid analysis method to evaluate the level of bacterial injury based on the GDT approach using real-time PCR. Principally, the GDT analysis can be used to estimate the levels of bacterial injury based on the differences in repair time observed as lag time, which follows exposure to different physical stresses of varying intensity (Fig.…”
Section: Predicting Bacterial Growth Behavior In Dynamic Temperature ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the recovery was not observed by the conventional plate count method. Figure 5 shows a comparison of the GDT of S. Enteritidis in PBS and ground beef after heat exposure at 55°C (Kawasaki et al 2018). Compared with PBS, ground beef samples were found to exhibit lower GDT values, despite the similarity in central temperature.…”
Section: Predicting Bacterial Growth Behavior In Dynamic Temperature ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation