Heat Transfer, Volume 1 2006
DOI: 10.1115/imece2006-16144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth CO2 Consumption, and H2 Production of Anabaena Variabilis ATCC 29413-U Under Different Irradiances and CO2 Concentrations

Abstract: Aims: The objective of this study is to develop kinetic models based on batch experiments describing the growth, CO 2 consumption, and H 2 production of Anabaena variabilis ATCC 29413-U T M as functions of irradiance and CO 2 concentration. Methods and Results:A parametric experimental study is performed for irradiances from 1120 to 16100 lux and for initial CO 2 mole fractions from 0.03 to 0.20 in argon at pH 7.0 ± 0.4 with nitrate in the medium. Kinetic models are successfully developed based on the Monod mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The K iI values obtained by both Haldane and Aiba‐Edward models could be considered as relevant, as they are larger than the saturating light irradiance, which is 460 µE m −2 s −1 . In addition, it is also reported that A. variabilis growth rate was not inhibited by irradiance up to 216 µE m −2 s −1 . Despite the slight differences in the kinetic parameters and SSE values, the Haldane model provides more sensible kinetic parameter values especially the K iI value, which is within the range of light irradiance in the photo‐inhibition phase (460–910 µE m −2 s −1 ) and has the lowest SSE value compared with the other two models thus indicating the most suitable model to represent the experimental data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The K iI values obtained by both Haldane and Aiba‐Edward models could be considered as relevant, as they are larger than the saturating light irradiance, which is 460 µE m −2 s −1 . In addition, it is also reported that A. variabilis growth rate was not inhibited by irradiance up to 216 µE m −2 s −1 . Despite the slight differences in the kinetic parameters and SSE values, the Haldane model provides more sensible kinetic parameter values especially the K iI value, which is within the range of light irradiance in the photo‐inhibition phase (460–910 µE m −2 s −1 ) and has the lowest SSE value compared with the other two models thus indicating the most suitable model to represent the experimental data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…[40][41][42][43][44]51,52 Moreover, the maximum specific growth rate l max was 4.2 3 10 25 s 21 and the half-saturation and inhibition constants for irradiance, K S;G and K I;G were 38 W/m 2 and 400 W/m 2 , respectively. 54,55 Finally, the relative maximum growth rate and minimum intracellular phosphate mass fraction required for growth, l à max and k q , were 0.24 and 2.7 mg P/g DW. 51 Synechococcus (2 strains) 40 2 9 1 .…”
Section: Mass Transport Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Such data can be used for modeling growth kinetics. In prior work, a kinetic model for growth of T. variabilis was developed based on the Monod model as a function of CO 2 and light intensity . Predictive models are increasingly important as algal biomass generated from wastewater treatment process is being used for the production of biofuels when scaling up from laboratory‐scale to industrial‐scale cultures.…”
Section: Physico‐chemical Factors Affect T Variabilis Biomass Producmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature is another parameter affecting H 2 photo‐production. A short‐term thermal stress (30–36 °C) enhances nitrogenase activity of T. variabilis The results of studying CO 2 concentration, as a carbon source, demonstrated that an optimum initial CO 2 molar fraction of 0.05 is required for maximum biomass production . Inclusion of a carbon source, such as glucose, also gives rise to further hydrogen production …”
Section: Bioenergy Production Using T Variabilismentioning
confidence: 99%