2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2007.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth behavior of Cu/Al intermetallic compounds and cracks in copper ball bonds during isothermal aging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
108
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
108
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Significantly, the temperature was measured at the center of the nugget, whereas the local melting occurred at its periphery. The copper matrix underwent greater plastic deformation and stress at the periphery of the nugget [25]. The frictional energy intensity at the periphery of the welding region was always maximum [26].…”
Section: Microstructure Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Significantly, the temperature was measured at the center of the nugget, whereas the local melting occurred at its periphery. The copper matrix underwent greater plastic deformation and stress at the periphery of the nugget [25]. The frictional energy intensity at the periphery of the welding region was always maximum [26].…”
Section: Microstructure Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Fig. 10 shows an example from a recently published review of ball bonding materials science [13] and examples of similar squeeze out can be seen in as-bonded copper ball bonded packages in industry and in recent literature such as the study by Hang et al [14].…”
Section: The Ball Bonding Processmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…There was no pattern to the cratering after ageing. More recently, Hang et al [14] have found cracking of Cu-Al intermetallics after high temperature storage of encapsulated copper ball bonds at 250°C.…”
Section: Reliability Studies 2003 To Presentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the price of Au is increasing and copper (Cu) has been investigated as the most suitable alternative because of its lower cost, slower intermetallic growth on aluminum (Al) pads, and higher thermal conductivity. [1][2][3][4] The growth rate of Cu/Al IMCs are around 10% of that for Au/Al IMCs during annealing from 150°C to 300°C. This is attributed to two reasons; one is the larger size of Cu atoms (atomic radii 0.128 nm) which show a larger misfit with Al (0.143 nm), comparing with Au atoms (0.144 nm) and the other is lower electronegativity of Cu than Au.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%