Growth aspirations in SMEs: managerial determinants and organizational outcomes

Abstract

PurposeThe main purpose of this study is to increase the scholarly understanding of managerial growth aspirations in small firms. Research has shown that managers' aspirations are important to ensure firms' growth, but researchers know less of where their aspirations come from and how variation in these aspirations shapes organizational outcomes. By focusing on two growth strategies of particular importance for small firms – innovation and internationalization – the authors map out how managers' ambitious aspirations may create negative organizational effects and also how they may counteract such effects.Design/methodology/approachThe study employs structural equation modeling (SEM) on a sample of 249 Norwegian small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).FindingsThe findings of this study suggest that managerial experience is associated with high aspirations as well as high change effectiveness on the managerial team. The authors find that ambitious growth aspirations are associated with exploration in the form of radical innovation but also lead to reduced employee well-being. Managers' level of perceived change effectiveness, on the other hand, is positively associated with radical innovation and also raises employee well-being.Research limitations/implicationsThis study highlights the positive and negative effects of managerial aspirations on different organizational outcomes. Further, it shows that managerial teams working effectively together in the face of change is important for the well-being of employees. Results confirm the positive relationship between aspirations for growth and applied growth strategies in organizations. The data sample is, however, extracted from one country only, and the authors cannot exclude the possibility that findings will be different elsewhere.Practical implicationsTo ensure successful growth, managers should combine ambitious aspirations with attention to the top management team's (TMT) experience levels and change effectiveness. Assessment of possible needs for development and adjustments could ensure growth processes with limited negative effects for employee well-being.Originality/valueBy distinguishing between growth through international sales (exploitation) and growth through a more change-intensive strategy of radical innovation (exploration), the authors investigate how variations in managerial aspirations and perceptions influence organizational growth processes. This paper paints a unique picture of how managers can be both the cause and cure of employee well-being in change-demanding situations.

The entrepreneurial journey in Vietnam's public relations industry: the motivation, the role and the challenges

“…They don't want the risk of scaling up too quickly and then running out of money or being unable to keep up with customer demand after expanding too quickly. As managerial experience is associated with the motivation to grow a company (Eide et al, 2021), entrepreneurs with less managerial experience and skills prefer smaller companies with simpler structures, lower operating costs and easier management (Steffens et al, 2009). Moreover, founders typically have significant equity, personal and emotional investments in the company.…”

Continuous Growth through Entrepreneurial Leadership: A Case study on a Packaging Company in Sri Lanka

“…According to Sarlija et al (2016), growth in terms of assets is also crucial for an organization to experience growth. Eide et al (2021) mention that a broader customer base and customer demand play an important role in experiencing long-term success and growth.…”

“…By acquiring new machinery as per requirement and expanding factory area, KSPA anticipated growth in their investments. Eide et al (2021) argue that a broader customer base and customer demand enable firms to experience long-term success. KSPA acquired many valuable customers such as IKEA to their customer base.…”

The novelty-centered business model: a transition mechanism between exploration and exploitation in SMEs

“…, 2020, p. 1). Nevertheless, scholars often position exploration and exploitation as antagonistic processes (Birkinshaw and Gupta, 2013; Eide et al ., 2021; He and Wong, 2004; March, 1991; Park et al ., 2002; Swift, 2016; Uotila et al ., 2009; Van Deusen and Mueller, 1999). As such, the earliest solutions to achieve organizational ambidexterity, especially in larger firms, focused on the separation of the two activities into different divisions or units, a phenomenon referred to as structural ambidexterity (Duncan, 1976; Lavie et al.…”

“…Scholars generally agree that maintaining a firm's competitive advantage requires organizational ambidexterity (Kang and Kim, 2020;Lavie et al, 2010;Soto-Acosta et al, 2018), defined as the "ability to pursue both exploratory and exploitative activities" (Tarba et al, 2020, p. 1). Nevertheless, scholars often position exploration and exploitation as antagonistic processes (Birkinshaw and Gupta, 2013;Eide et al, 2021;He and Wong, 2004;March, 1991;Park et al, 2002;Swift, 2016;Uotila et al, 2009;Van Deusen and Mueller, 1999). As such, the earliest solutions to achieve organizational ambidexterity, especially in larger firms, focused on the separation of the two activities into different divisions or units, a phenomenon referred to as structural ambidexterity (Duncan, 1976;Lavie et al, 2010;O'Reilly and Tushman, 2013), which independently allocates resources (both human and material) to exploration and exploitation activities (Duncan, 1976;Jansen et al, 2005Jansen et al, , 2009Jansen et al, , 2012O'Reilly and Tushman, 2013;Tamayo-Torres et al, 2017;Turner and Lee-Kelley, 2013;Uotila et al, 2009).…”