Abstract:Two California native perennial grasses, nodding needlegrass [Nassella cernua (Stebbins & R.M. Love) Barkworth] and California barley [Hordeum brachyantherum Nevski ssp. californicum (Covas & Stebbins) Bothmer, N. Jacobsen & Seberg], were compared with a conventional grass cover crop, ‘Blando’ brome (Bromus hordeaceus L.), as well as resident (weedy) vegetation and a clean cultivated … Show more
“…This result can be attributed to the fact that the regular mulching of alfalfa cover crop biomass led to decomposition and produced enough organic N to help meet the nutritional needs of trees. This assumption is supported by Wilson et al (2010), who reported that mowing alfalfa groundcovers once every 3 weeks returned an average of 2.5 tÁha -1 of green manure to the ground, corresponding to 85 kgÁha -1 of accumulated organic N. Positive groundcover effects have been reported in cultivated grapes (Costello, 2010) and several other fruit-based agricultural cropping systems (Radovich et al, 2009). The finding is also in line with Kuhn and Pedersen (2009) who reported that a cover crop-based system with regular mulching produced vigorous tree growth and significantly higher tree productivity.…”
High rates of inorganic fertilizers are used in conventional intensive production systems such as Abies fraseri (fraser fir) cropping systems for Christmas trees. Groundcovers can be used as green mulches, help reduce the use of farm chemicals, and provide several environmental benefits. We investigated the performance of a low-input cropping system by combining two legume cover crops [Dutch white clover (Trifolium repens) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa)] in combination with low rates of inorganic fertilizers as a step toward a more sustainable production system. The randomized block design comprised one cover crop and one of three applications of reduced rate inorganic fertilizer (75%, 50%, and 25% of the recommended rate). A conventional system using herbicides for weed control and the 100% rate of inorganic fertilizer was used as a control. Parameters measured included tree morphology, foliar nitrogen concentration, soil mineral nitrogen, and nitrate-N leaching below the root zone. A significant positive growth response (height and diameter) was obtained in all alfalfa-based cropping systems. This was accompanied by foliar nutrient concentrations similar to conventional plots and a reduction in nitrate-N leaching. However, in white clover-based cropping systems, the growth response was reduced (both height and diameter), suggesting competition for soil resources. In addition, the total nitrate-N leaching was higher in this system, suggesting an imbalance between mineral nitrogen availability and use in white clover-based cropping systems. We conclude that if the potential competition between cover crops and trees can be properly managed, legume cover crops can be effectively used to make intensive production tree-based systems more sustainable. Further studies related to mineralization and macronutrient flows are needed before any definite recommendation can be made about the use of these systems in large-scale production systems.
“…This result can be attributed to the fact that the regular mulching of alfalfa cover crop biomass led to decomposition and produced enough organic N to help meet the nutritional needs of trees. This assumption is supported by Wilson et al (2010), who reported that mowing alfalfa groundcovers once every 3 weeks returned an average of 2.5 tÁha -1 of green manure to the ground, corresponding to 85 kgÁha -1 of accumulated organic N. Positive groundcover effects have been reported in cultivated grapes (Costello, 2010) and several other fruit-based agricultural cropping systems (Radovich et al, 2009). The finding is also in line with Kuhn and Pedersen (2009) who reported that a cover crop-based system with regular mulching produced vigorous tree growth and significantly higher tree productivity.…”
High rates of inorganic fertilizers are used in conventional intensive production systems such as Abies fraseri (fraser fir) cropping systems for Christmas trees. Groundcovers can be used as green mulches, help reduce the use of farm chemicals, and provide several environmental benefits. We investigated the performance of a low-input cropping system by combining two legume cover crops [Dutch white clover (Trifolium repens) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa)] in combination with low rates of inorganic fertilizers as a step toward a more sustainable production system. The randomized block design comprised one cover crop and one of three applications of reduced rate inorganic fertilizer (75%, 50%, and 25% of the recommended rate). A conventional system using herbicides for weed control and the 100% rate of inorganic fertilizer was used as a control. Parameters measured included tree morphology, foliar nitrogen concentration, soil mineral nitrogen, and nitrate-N leaching below the root zone. A significant positive growth response (height and diameter) was obtained in all alfalfa-based cropping systems. This was accompanied by foliar nutrient concentrations similar to conventional plots and a reduction in nitrate-N leaching. However, in white clover-based cropping systems, the growth response was reduced (both height and diameter), suggesting competition for soil resources. In addition, the total nitrate-N leaching was higher in this system, suggesting an imbalance between mineral nitrogen availability and use in white clover-based cropping systems. We conclude that if the potential competition between cover crops and trees can be properly managed, legume cover crops can be effectively used to make intensive production tree-based systems more sustainable. Further studies related to mineralization and macronutrient flows are needed before any definite recommendation can be made about the use of these systems in large-scale production systems.
“…In the current study, if the higher in-row soil moisture in the nodding needlegrass treatment means that these vines used less in-row water, this should have been reflected in a smaller vine canopy, i.e., having lower vigor, than under clean cultivation. However, the vines in the nodding needlegrass and clean cultivation treatments had equivalent pruning weights, which is an index of vigor and canopy size, and vine trunk diameter was greater in the nodding needlegrass treatment compared with clean cultivation (Costello, 2010). There is therefore little evidence that lower vine water use explains the higher inrow soil moisture content in the nodding needlegrass treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…If the vine roots were located primarily in the in-row zone as has been shown for drip-irrigated vineyards (Stevens and Douglas, 1994), the extra water use by the nodding needlegrass cover crop in the between-row zone, occurring primarily during the off-season, should have had little effect on vine growth or yield. Indeed, this was the case, because yield and pruning weight with nodding needlegrass as a cover crop was equivalent with clean cultivation (Costello, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study's focus on nodding needlegrass and its effect on water relations was part of a larger experiment on vineyard cover crops (Costello, 2010). Cover crop treatments were established in Nov. 1996, and nodding needlegrass was planted at a rate of 13.2 kgÁha -1 equivalent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intent of the present study was to evaluate the potential for California native grasses as vineyard cover crops, and furthermore, how one species, nodding needlegrass, affects soil-and vine-water relations. Vine vigor and yield data of nodding needlegrass and other cover crops in this study are presented in another paper (Costello, 2010). The native range of nodding needlegrass extends from the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys through the coastal regions of central and southern California (Beetle, 1947).…”
Nodding needlegrass [Nassella cernua (Stebbins & R.M. Love) Barkworth], a California native perennial grass, was tested for its effects on grapevine and soil–water relations in a drip-irrigated vineyard in Parlier, CA. Vine water status and in-row and between-row soil moisture (at 0.3 m, 0.6 m, 0.9 m, 1.2 m, and 1.5 m) were monitored semiweekly from June to September. There was no overall significant difference in leaf water potential between treatments. In-row soil moisture was lowest at depths of 0.6 m to 0.9 m within the nodding needlegrass treatment but was lowest from 0.3 m to 0.9 m within the clean cultivation treatment. Compared with clean cultivation, nodding needlegrass in-row soil moisture was significantly higher at depths of 0.3 m and 0.6. m and did not differ at depths of 0.9 m and 1.2 m. In contrast, in-row soil moisture was significantly higher under clean cultivation compared with nodding needlegrass at 1.5 m. Between-row soil moisture was significantly higher under clean cultivation compared with nodding needlegrass at every depth. Combining in-row and between-row data, overall vineyard soil moisture was slightly lower, by 1.2% points, in the nodding needlegrass treatment compared with clean cultivation. There was no interaction between treatment and depth for between-row soil moisture, indicating that the vines used little water from the between-row area. The lack of difference between treatments in the rate of soil moisture depletion over the season indicates that nodding needlegrass used little water during the summer. Based on these results, nodding needlegrass appears to be suitable as a permanent cover crop in California drip-irrigated vineyards where competition for summer water is a concern.
The present systematic review aims to provide an overview of the impact of cover crops on vegetative growth and the productive parameters of vineyards.A systematic review was made on Scopus-index journals dating from 1999 to 2018. The selection was made at the same time by two different researchers, who selected a total of 272 published papers related to cover crops in vineyards. Each article was categorised according to its theme and a metadata database was created, considering all relevant information from an agronomic point of view for each article.It can be concluded from the review that the use of cover crops can reduce vine vegetative growth, which in turn can help keep the incidence of fungal diseases (like grey mould) at a low level. In general, this practice does not have a clear effect on vineyard yield or grape juice parameters, like total soluble solids (TSS) or titratable acidity (TA). Cover crops can decrease vineyard pests to a certain extent, especially Cicadellidae. Cover crops can sometimes sporadically cause water stress in the vineyard, but only during the summer months.This review allowed us to summarise available information on cover crops and their effects on vineyard agronomic performance in a systematic way. Such information can be used to help select the most suitable cover, based on specific vineyard objectives and growing conditions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.