Growth and species interactions of Eucalyptus pellita in a mixed and monoculture plantation in the humid tropics of north Queensland

Abstract

This study investigated whether mixed-species designs can increase the growth of a tropical eucalypt when compared to monocultures. Monocultures of Eucalyptus pellita (E) and Acacia peregrina (A) and mixtures in various proportions (75E:25A, 50E:50A, 25E:75A) were planted in a replacement series design on the Atherton Tablelands of north Queensland, Australia. High mortality in the establishment phase due to repeated damage by tropical cyclones altered the trial design. Effects of experimental designs on tree growth were estimated using a linear mixed-effects model with restricted maximum likelihood analysis (REML). Volume growth of individual eucalypt trees were positively affected by the presence of acacia trees at age 5 years and this effect generally increased with time up to age 10 years. However, the stand volume and basal area increased with increasing proportions of E. pellita, due to its larger individual tree size. Conventional analysis did not offer convincing support for mixedspecies designs. Preliminary individual-based modelling using a modified Hegyi competition index offered a solution and an equation that indicates acacias have positive ecological interactions (facilitation or competitive reduction) and definitely do not cause competition like a eucalypt. These results suggest that significantly increased in growth rates could be achieved with mixed-species designs. This statistical methodology could enable a better understanding of species interactions in similarly altered experiments, or undesigned mixed-species plantations. #

The influence of competition and species mixture on plantation-grown white spruce: Growth and foliar nutrient response after 20 years

“…Differences in species' competitiveness are, however, not accounted for by HCI. Nevertheless, this index has proven useful as a measure of the competitive effects of neighboring trees on individual tree growth (Clinton et al 1997, Bristow et al 2006.…”

Species-site matching in mixed species plantations of native trees in tropical Australia

“…Reduced productivity in mixtures has often been associated with asymmetric competition between species as plantations develop (Cavard et al 2010;Hunt et al 2006;Chen et al 2003). Whilst studies investigating neighbourhood effects have identified the inter-specific competitive effects in mixtures (Canham et al 2004;Bristow et al 2006), others have found the size of neighbours, rather than species identity, as the largest source of variation in individual tree diameter and height (Erickson et al 2009;Potvin and Dutilleul 2009).…”

Can lessons from the Community Rainforest Reforestation Program in eastern Australia be learned?

“…One should not conclude from Table 1 that Acacia mangium is the ideal species, as the table shows only those species planted in more than one rainfall-soil category. Eucalyptus pellita was also widely planted, and performed well, particularly when planted in a mixture with acacias (Bristow et al 2006). Glencross and Nichols (2005) presented similar data for plantings in northern New South Wales, and ranked species according to height, diameter and stem straightness.…”