2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and physiological response of eastern white pine seedlings to partial cutting and site preparation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
22
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Near 50% light condition is an oft-suggested level for keeping balance between protection against pests and adequate growth [51,[57][58][59][60]. Short-term volume losses of white pine grown under shaded conditions are compensated by long-term gain, as white pine grows taller and larger over time than other tree species present in the study area.…”
Section: Site Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near 50% light condition is an oft-suggested level for keeping balance between protection against pests and adequate growth [51,[57][58][59][60]. Short-term volume losses of white pine grown under shaded conditions are compensated by long-term gain, as white pine grows taller and larger over time than other tree species present in the study area.…”
Section: Site Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under moderate shade, natural regeneration exhibits enhanced emergence, growth, and survival provided optimal seedbed is available (Thomas and Wein 1984). Field and controlled environment studies have shown that white pine regeneration survives and grows poorly at light levels ≤10%, requires light levels of ≈30% for competitive height growth, and attains maximum height growth at 40% to 50% light (Logan 1966, Boucher et al 2007, Fahey and Lorimer 2013. Significant weevil damage to white pine regeneration begins when seedlings are 1 m tall and declines markedly at heights ≥5 to 6 m. (Ostry et al 2010).…”
Section: Conclusion and Management Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La première est celle que les DS sont des milieux offrant une plus faible disponibilité de nutriments forçant les arbres à développer leurs systèmes racinaires davantage afin de s'ajuster aux ressources disponibles et de pouvoir atteindre des microsites plus fertiles (Lavender et al 1990;Prévost et Dumais 2003). Une a cependant révélé que des pessières à lichens et des pessières à mousses adjacentes sont similaires quant à la disponibilité des nutriments contenus dans leur solution de sol (Girard 2004 Il s'ensuit un développement supérieur du système racinaire afin d'obtenir les ressources hydriques nécessaires (Naidu et DeLucia 1997;Pearcy et Valladares 1999;Boucher et al 2007). Cela expliquerait la grande proportion en biomasse occupée par les aiguilles, les branches et les racines comparativement à celle de la tige.…”
Section: Réservoirs De Carboneunclassified