2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and photosynthetic responses in Brassica napus differ during stress and recovery periods when exposed to combined heat, drought and elevated CO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For California and Nevada, the same holds true with increasing ET 0 for both CO2-adjusted (based on Yang et al, 2019) and unadjusted estimates ( Figure S12). Although we acknowledge this concern, experiments on actual vegetative responses to elevated CO2 find minimal or no drought reducing effects on 10.1029/2020EF001736 various types of vegetation and ecosystems (e.g., Bachofen et al, 2018;Birami et al, 2020;Dikšaitytė et al, 2019;Duan et al, 2014;Jiang et al, 2020;Nackley et al, 2018). Furthermore, the 2012-2016 extreme hot drought in California and Nevada, intensified by CO2 driven warming (e.g., Shukla et al, 2015;Williams et al, 2015), resulted in major declines in vegetative health for parts of California (Dong et al, 2019) further calling into question whether future CO2 increases will mitigate drying, drought, and fire danger.…”
Section: 1029/2020ef001736mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For California and Nevada, the same holds true with increasing ET 0 for both CO2-adjusted (based on Yang et al, 2019) and unadjusted estimates ( Figure S12). Although we acknowledge this concern, experiments on actual vegetative responses to elevated CO2 find minimal or no drought reducing effects on 10.1029/2020EF001736 various types of vegetation and ecosystems (e.g., Bachofen et al, 2018;Birami et al, 2020;Dikšaitytė et al, 2019;Duan et al, 2014;Jiang et al, 2020;Nackley et al, 2018). Furthermore, the 2012-2016 extreme hot drought in California and Nevada, intensified by CO2 driven warming (e.g., Shukla et al, 2015;Williams et al, 2015), resulted in major declines in vegetative health for parts of California (Dong et al, 2019) further calling into question whether future CO2 increases will mitigate drying, drought, and fire danger.…”
Section: 1029/2020ef001736mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, focusing on environmental/agricultural drought conditions in future scenarios, the role of CO 2 effects on AED could be strongly different than for average conditions (or even than for mild drought conditions) (Morgan et al, 2004;Xu, Jiang, Jia, & Zhou, 2016). Different experiments based on enriched CO 2 conditions have showed that elevated CO 2 does not reduce nor delay tree mortality under drought (Bachofen, Moser, Hoch, Ghazoul, & Wohlgemuth, 2018;Duan et al, 2014Duan et al, , 2015, and that the same pattern occurs in pastures and shrubs (Nackley et al, 2018) and in crops (Dikšaitytė, Viršilė, Žaltauskaitė, Januškaitienė, & Juozapaitienė, 2019).…”
Section: Co 2 -Driven Radiative Forcing Versus Co 2 Physiological Effects On Stomatal Regulation: Implications For Future Drought Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…because warming can cause or intensify water stress, studies have shown that warming has more positive effects on photosynthesis when soil moisture is less limiting and more negative effects at low soil moisture (Arend, Brem, Kuster, & Günthardt-Goerg, 2013;Dikšaitytė, Viršilė, Žaltauskaitė, Januškaitienė, & Juozapaitienė, 2019;Reich et al, 2018). However, other studies have failed to find interactive effects of warming and precipitation on rates of photosynthesis (Rodgers, Hoeppner, Daley, & Dukes, 2012;B.…”
Section: The Influence Of Reduced Rainfall and Eco2 On Responses To Elevated Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%