2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-015-2690-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and longevity of Lithophaga lithophaga: what can we learn from shell structure and stable isotope composition?

Abstract: to a temperature range of 13 °C. The reconstructed seawater temperatures (T δ18Oshell ) ranged between 12 and 25 °C, a range in good agreement with measured temperature. Stable carbon isotope values decreased through ontogeny and ranged between −2.05 and 2.32 ‰ (x = 0.01 ± 0.89 ‰). Results of this study provide the first stable isotope data for L. lithophaga shells and show the potential of this species as a geochemical sclerochronological archive.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Associated with the marine terrace deposits are (a) palaeoshorelines, located up-dip from the terrace deposits, defined by palaeo-sea-cliffs cut into bedrock limestones, marked by shoreline notches lined with lithophagid borings and other shoreline fauna (algal encrustations, gastropods, echinoderms, bivalves and, rarely, corals), and (b) wave-cut platforms, that are the along strike correlatable surfaces to marine terrace deposits, characterised by erosive surfaces marked with millholes that are in turn marked by lithophagid borings. The borings are between 3-9 cm deep when formed (Peharda et al, 2015), though research by Devescovi and Ivesa, (2008) suggest a value closer to 6 cm is common, so their preservation with depths of a few centimetres indicates minimal erosion since their formation.…”
Section: Crete Geology and Tectonicsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Associated with the marine terrace deposits are (a) palaeoshorelines, located up-dip from the terrace deposits, defined by palaeo-sea-cliffs cut into bedrock limestones, marked by shoreline notches lined with lithophagid borings and other shoreline fauna (algal encrustations, gastropods, echinoderms, bivalves and, rarely, corals), and (b) wave-cut platforms, that are the along strike correlatable surfaces to marine terrace deposits, characterised by erosive surfaces marked with millholes that are in turn marked by lithophagid borings. The borings are between 3-9 cm deep when formed (Peharda et al, 2015), though research by Devescovi and Ivesa, (2008) suggest a value closer to 6 cm is common, so their preservation with depths of a few centimetres indicates minimal erosion since their formation.…”
Section: Crete Geology and Tectonicsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We use the approach outlined in Robertson et al (2019) to identify surfaces that have experienced minimal erosion based on the presence of preserved lithophagid borings and millholes. The depth of lithophagid borings upon formation is between 3-9 cm (Peharda et al, 2015) while millholes, that is, erosional hollows formed by pebble agitation in the intertidal zone, are usually a few centimeters to a few decimetres deep. Therefore, the preservation of these features allows us to be confident that we can constrain erosion to less than a few millimetres or centimetres.…”
Section: CL Sampling Approach and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associated with the marine terrace deposits are (a) palaeoshorelines, located updip from the terrace deposits, defined by palaeo sea‐cliffs cut into bedrock limestones, marked by shoreline notches lined with lithophagid borings and other shoreline fauna (algal encrustations; gastropods; echinoderms; bivalves; and, rarely, corals), and (b) wave‐cut platforms, which are the along‐strike correlatable surfaces to marine terrace deposits, characterized by erosive surfaces marked with millholes that are in turn marked by lithophagid borings. The borings are between 3 and 9 cm deep when formed (Peharda et al, ), though research by Devescovi and Iveša () suggests a value closer to 6 cm is common, so their preservation with depths of a few centimeters indicates minimal erosion since their formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%