2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and inequality under different hierarchical education regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A stream of endogenous growth models research has been focussing on investment in education for human capital formation fostering economic growth, reducing inequality, and promoting individual well-being (Annabi, 2017). One strand within the stream focusses on public and private investments in education and their impact (see Bräuninger, and Vidal, 2000;Arcalean and Schiopu, 2010;Magalhães and Turchick, 2022). The focus of the research in this strand has been the impact of education on either growth or inequality or both.…”
Section: Cointegration and Causality Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A stream of endogenous growth models research has been focussing on investment in education for human capital formation fostering economic growth, reducing inequality, and promoting individual well-being (Annabi, 2017). One strand within the stream focusses on public and private investments in education and their impact (see Bräuninger, and Vidal, 2000;Arcalean and Schiopu, 2010;Magalhães and Turchick, 2022). The focus of the research in this strand has been the impact of education on either growth or inequality or both.…”
Section: Cointegration and Causality Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of the research in this strand has been the impact of education on either growth or inequality or both. Further, such impact is analysed through combinations of private and public expenditure on two different stages of education: school (k-12) and post-secondary or higher education (see Bräuninger, and Vidal, 2000;Arcalean and Schiopu, 2010;Annabi et al, 2011;Magalhães and Turchick, 2022).…”
Section: Cointegration and Causality Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%