2008
DOI: 10.3354/ame01203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and grazing responses of the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuminata as functions of light intensity and prey concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
91
7
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
7
91
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the confirmed toxigenic Dinophysis species all possess plastids and hence they are capable of performing photosynthesis. Moreover, toxin production has been clearly linked to photosynthesis (Kim et al, 2008). Hence the capacity for de novo DST production in heterotrophic species remains highly questionable, and it is more likely that heterotrophic dinoflagellates only accumulate toxins rather than produce them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the confirmed toxigenic Dinophysis species all possess plastids and hence they are capable of performing photosynthesis. Moreover, toxin production has been clearly linked to photosynthesis (Kim et al, 2008). Hence the capacity for de novo DST production in heterotrophic species remains highly questionable, and it is more likely that heterotrophic dinoflagellates only accumulate toxins rather than produce them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, Dinophysis spp. (Park et al 2006, Kim et al 2008, Esoptrodinium sp. (Fawcett and Parrow 2014), Paragymnodinium shiwhaense (Yoo et al 2010), and an unidentified Antarctic dinoflagellate (Gast et al 2007) fit this category.…”
Section: Growth Kinetics Of Polykrikos Lebourae Under Three Differentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) of P. lebourae was calculated according to Kim et al (2008): ingestion rates of P. lebourae were estimated from changes in prey cell numbers in treatments compared with prey densities in controls. Gross growth efficiency (GGE, %) was defined as predator carbon produced per prey carbon…”
Section: Growth and Grazing Of Polykrikos Lebourae With Different Prementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations