1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(98)00084-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and differentiation of human bone marrow osteoprogenitors on novel calcium phosphate cements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
73
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various in vitro bone regeneration strategies have relied on the use of the osteogenic supplements (dexamethasone, ascorbic acid, and b-glycerophosphate) to induce mineralization in vitro, 12,13,49,51,[53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] and each supplement has been shown to be imperative to induce mineralization of MSCs in vitro. 9,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17]22,29,[63][64][65][66][67] The main rationale behind the use of these supplements is to provide signaling proteins or enzymes to activate mineral production by MSCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various in vitro bone regeneration strategies have relied on the use of the osteogenic supplements (dexamethasone, ascorbic acid, and b-glycerophosphate) to induce mineralization in vitro, 12,13,49,51,[53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] and each supplement has been shown to be imperative to induce mineralization of MSCs in vitro. 9,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17]22,29,[63][64][65][66][67] The main rationale behind the use of these supplements is to provide signaling proteins or enzymes to activate mineral production by MSCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell culture studies indicated that there was no significant limitation in cell viability after 1 week of exposure to FeHA when compared to pure HA. The initial decrease in cell viability at days 1 and 3 may be due to the fact that although HA is biocompatible, some recent studies have shown that calcium phosphates can have an inhibitory effect on osteoblast in vitro [33][34][35]. Although in vitro cell culture studies are useful tools for initial-stage biological screening of biomaterials, behavior in vivo is completely different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were based on the utilization of supports, as gels and sponges of collagen type I, PLGA foam, DegraPol, agarose, Matrigel, or methylcellulose. 7,10,15,16,18,20,22,25,26,30,32,34,37,39 Normal human osteogenic cells, osteoblasts from prepubertal-age donors, or bone marrow stromal fibroblasts adhering to scaffolding of HAP/ TC, 16,20,25,26,30,34 collagraft, 26 collagen sponges, 15,39 or bone chips 5 were utilized to produce specifically 3D structures designed for direct implantation in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%