2006
DOI: 10.1080/00779962.2006.9722136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and development of captive-reared Mercury Islands tusked weta,Motuweta isolataJohns (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences could have refl ected the relative abundance of various types of vegetation between sites but we do not have relevant vegetation data to make the analysis. Ramsay (1955Ramsay ( , 1964, Richards (1973), Moller (1978), Meads & Moller (1978), Barrett & Ramsay (1991), Sherley & Hayes (1993), Richards (1994) and Stringer et al (2006) reported weta with damaged appendages similar to that seen in D. rugosa during the present study. The incidence of damage observed in the present study is within the ranges reported for other weta in the fi eld (respectively for males and females 2.5% and 3.4% in Deinacrida mahoenui (Richards 1994), and 12-17% and 23-42% in Hemideina crassidens on Arapawa Island and Stephens Island (Moller 1978(Moller , 1985.…”
Section: Habitat Usesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…These differences could have refl ected the relative abundance of various types of vegetation between sites but we do not have relevant vegetation data to make the analysis. Ramsay (1955Ramsay ( , 1964, Richards (1973), Moller (1978), Meads & Moller (1978), Barrett & Ramsay (1991), Sherley & Hayes (1993), Richards (1994) and Stringer et al (2006) reported weta with damaged appendages similar to that seen in D. rugosa during the present study. The incidence of damage observed in the present study is within the ranges reported for other weta in the fi eld (respectively for males and females 2.5% and 3.4% in Deinacrida mahoenui (Richards 1994), and 12-17% and 23-42% in Hemideina crassidens on Arapawa Island and Stephens Island (Moller 1978(Moller , 1985.…”
Section: Habitat Usesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In H. crassidens , large headed males with elongated mandibles engage in combat to defend cavities with female harems in a polygynandrous mating system [35,36]. The heads of the two sexes are completely indistinguishable prior to the 5 th instar, and most dimorphic mandibular development occurs in late instar males immediately prior to sexual maturity, consistent with other Orthopterans [37,38]. It is thus possible that late sub-adult and adult males could have specific nutrient needs based either on the cost of developing or maintaining large mandibles, or costs associated with male-male combat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…New Zealand weta use elaborate cuticular stridulatory structures to produce acoustic signals, most commonly for defense but also in intraspecific signalling 610 . Amongst New Zealand weta, large tympanal hearing organs which detect airborne sound have developed in the foreleg tibia of tree weta ( Hemideina , 8 spp.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different groups of orthopteran insects, including grasshoppers (Caelifera), crickets, tettigoniids and weta (Ensifera), have evolved diverse and complex signalling systems based on the production and reception of sound or substrate vibration 1 – 5 . New Zealand weta use elaborate cuticular stridulatory structures to produce acoustic signals, most commonly for defense but also in intraspecific signalling 6 10 . Amongst New Zealand weta, large tympanal hearing organs which detect airborne sound have developed in the foreleg tibia of tree weta ( Hemideina , 8 spp.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%