2008
DOI: 10.1017/s175173110700095x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and development of adipose tissue and gut and related endocrine status during early growth in the pig: impact of low birth weight

Abstract: With genetic selection, the increase in litter size has led to higher variation in within-litter birth weights in pigs. This has been associated with a reduction in mean birth weights and a rise in the proportion of piglets weighing less than 1 kg at birth. Low birth weight pigs exhibit lower postnatal growth rates and feed efficiency, which may be explained by an inadequate digestion and/or nutrient use as a consequence of prenatal undernutrition. It is now documented that there is a relationship between birt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
(133 reference statements)
2
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…plasma leptin) (Poore and Fowden, 2004b;Morise et al, 2008). LBW pigs exhibit glucose intolerance (Figure 2), irrespective of whether they are reared under standard commercial (Corson et al, 2009) or experimental conditions (Poore and Fowden, 2004b), and the methodology used for a glucose tolerance test (GTT).…”
Section: Litten-brown Corson and Clarkementioning
confidence: 99%
“…plasma leptin) (Poore and Fowden, 2004b;Morise et al, 2008). LBW pigs exhibit glucose intolerance (Figure 2), irrespective of whether they are reared under standard commercial (Corson et al, 2009) or experimental conditions (Poore and Fowden, 2004b), and the methodology used for a glucose tolerance test (GTT).…”
Section: Litten-brown Corson and Clarkementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In pigs, decades of intensive genetic selection has brought larger litters but more very low birth weight pigs (,1 kg) and higher within-litter birth weight variation (Morise et al, 2008). Very low birth weight pigs (runts) account for 10% to 15% of littermates with mortality statistics typically between 9% and 12% of all neonates (Ramsay et al, 2010), but as high as 50%.…”
Section: Other Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this has been exacerbated during the last decades where intensive selection for increased litter size in pig production has led to larger litter variation in birth body weight (BW) with the consequences that more piglets are stillborn and born small with a low survival rate (Milligan et al, 2002). Furthermore, low birth body weight (LBW) pigs, as a result of IUGR, may have some (Nissen et al, 2004;Gondret et al, 2006;Morise et al, 2008;Rehfeldt et al, 2008) negative -E-mail: Niels.Oksbjerg@Agrsci.dk consequences on carcass and meat-quality traits like pH, drip loss, tenderness and meat colour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%